8 ms·
He owns the rights to the pictures he takes. No purchase necessary. Especially in the context of wildlife, there are no human subjects to cloud the issue.
by presumably 6y ago
He owns the rights to the pictures he takes. No purchase necessary. Especially in the context of wildlife, there are no human subjects to cloud the issue.
- robterrell 6y agoMy guess was the same as the parent poster's -- the pictures of the monkey grabbing the phone, from the phone's point of view, belonged to the tourist, right? Because the phone belonged to the tourist? The photographer must have acquired those rights afterwards. (Although I don't recall the outcome of the copyright case of the monkey that took its own photograph back in 2014...)
- aqme28 6y agoThey would belong to the monkey, actually! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_dispute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_disput... (actually it's very controversial)
- strathmeyer 6y agoApparently only websites that steal photos feel monkeys can own things.
- andromeduck 6y agoPart of a long list of reasons why I will never support Peta.
- claudiawerner 6y agoAnd for me, part of a long list of reasons I will never be in favor of copyright (unless turned back on itself, as the GPL or other free licenses allow).
- soneil 6y agoThat concerned pictures taken by the monkey. This is pictures taken by a photographer, with his own camera, by his own will. Nothing remotely disputable.
- Dunedan 6y agoIf you're talking about the picture with the title "Lens inspection", this wasn't shot by an iPhone, but by one of his Nikon cameras: https://500px.com/photo/17629635/Lens-Inspection-by-Marsel-van-Oosten https://500px.com/photo/17629635/Lens-Inspection-by-Marsel-v...