pmorici

18 ms·

1.
by pmorici 2y ago
They have a couple people to manage test drives and they will ask if you have any questions and make sure your aware of the current interest rate or other sales incentives but they aren’t sales people in the sense that you would typically b
2.
by pmorici 2y ago
If receiving stock based compensation is grounds for not being independent then wouldn't most companies have an independence issue with their boards? It just seems like a crazy claim on it's face.
3.
by pmorici 2y ago
The Tesla knows when it's cameras and blinded by sun and act accordingly or tells the human to take over.
4.
by pmorici 2y ago
Half the so called dock workers don’t actually work. They sit at home and collect, “container royalties”. https://nypost.com/2024/10/04/business/how-did-50k-dockworke...
5.
by pmorici 2y ago
I wouldn’t say they have caught up. The self driving features alone are in a league of their own. Supercharger network is also unmatched for reach and reliability.
6.
by pmorici 2y ago
Making purchase decisions based on a company executive’s personal political opinions is dumb. It’s a self own to buy an inferior product for political reasons.
7.
by pmorici 2y ago
Does anyone have any tips for debugging EFI_STUB kernels when they fail to boot? I've run into BIOS before that I can't get EFI_STUB to work on but grub works fine and I'm not sure why or even how to go about getting any deb
8.
by pmorici 2y ago
Is this similar to the Extropic approach but a different mechanism?
9.
by pmorici 2y ago
The notion that rich people aren’t concerned with long term outcomes seems like one of those things that isn’t true. In fact the reverse is often said the poor have, “nothing to lose”. Many wealthy people have gotten where they are by foc
10.
by pmorici 2y ago
Nicely written. I’m a bit confused about the part that seems to conflate individualism with fame or notoriety.
11.
by pmorici 2y ago
TPM and checking your physical security boundary hasn't been breached.
12.
by pmorici 3y ago
I would guess the highest leverage thing you could do is open source some of your work on Github as samples to show potential employers. If you are just getting by your top priority should probably be to find better employment ASAP. Makin
13.
Shut Up About The F-35(youtube.com)
2 points by pmorici 3y ago|1 comments
14.
by pmorici 3y ago
In truly rural or remote areas relative to any available alternative it is as close to a miracle product as one could imagine. If you haven’t had to use other satellite Internet services like BGAN, Iridium, viasat, etc… it’s hard to explai
15.
by pmorici 3y ago
It seems they did repeatedly say they could do it but fcc just ignored them.
16.
by pmorici 3y ago
Because the obligation was to meet the requirements in 2025 and FCC basically just subjectivity said 2 years before the deadline they don’t think they will.
17.
by pmorici 3y ago
The reasoning that is there is all subjective.
18.
by pmorici 3y ago
That's not how it works, they just need to offer a service tier that provides a service with the required minimums by a particular date, it is obviously possible unless you are blinded by revenge politics.
19.
by pmorici 3y ago
Seeing as they offer service basically everywhere in the US right now and the only quibble is that the average speed is only 75 Mbps instead of 100 Mbps I'd say they are well ahead of 40%.
20.
by pmorici 3y ago
Today your speed tier is based on what you pay. If you pay for the priority or business tier service you absolutely get over 100Mbps consistently, a lot more. If you pay for the basic service tier then yeah you might only get 3-4x DSL spe
21.
by pmorici 3y ago
It doesn't. This was originally legislated as a hand out to legacy telecom companies that lobbied for it. Seeing as it exists though I would rather the money be spent with the best option instead of it being used as a political retri
22.
by pmorici 3y ago
Yes, but that is a function of satellite density or so the argument seems to suggest. SpaceX is launching rockets multiple times a week and has put more satellites into orbit that any entity in the history of human kind by an order of magn
23.
by pmorici 3y ago
"Musk still managed to slide in and loot a few billion dollars before they realized that Starlink can't meet their definition of "broadband."" That's false. SpaceX doesn't appear to have actually received
24.
by pmorici 3y ago
Because if you use the service you know it is capable of that and more today. SpaceX is also capable of providing differentiated service speeds so looking at what an average user is getting today is not indicative of what could be provided
25.
by pmorici 3y ago
If the terms of the deal were that they didn't need to hit the performance benchmarks until 2025 and they have demonstrated that the technology was capable of those speeds it makes little sense to do this now except as a thinly vailed
26.
by pmorici 3y ago
He doesn't, he has publicly said the company didn't lobby for this program. If it exists though would you rather have the most efficient player be award the contract or some legacy telco who lobbied for the largesse and is woeful
27.
by pmorici 3y ago
Starlink service is so obviously phenomenal to anyone who's used it, this isn't going to change that or effect SpaceX's success one bit. The FCC's actions here are just embarrassing their agency by exposing their petty
28.
by pmorici 3y ago
Looks like a bunch of people who don’t have any information speculating about something which they have no prior experience with (new body construction style) and reporter’s reporting it as some how news worthy to get a sensational article.
29.
by pmorici 3y ago
I don’t think that is true. It has a front crumple zone there are some photos and videos of the crash tested vehicle showing that and discussing it.
30.
by pmorici 3y ago
I wonder if they could wire the jamming system into the fire alarm. Pulling the alarm turns off the jamming.

More ›