14 ms·

It doesn't. This was originally legislated as a hand out to legacy telecom companies that lobbied for it. Seeing as it exists though I would rather the money

It doesn't. This was originally legislated as a hand out to legacy telecom companies that lobbied for it. Seeing as it exists though I would rather the money be spent with the best option instead of it being used as a political retribution fund.

bmitc 3y ago
So the requirements set out however long ago that Starlink agreed to and now isn't meeting is political retribution? How so?
- pmorici 3y ago
  Because the obligation was to meet the requirements in 2025 and FCC basically just subjectivity said 2 years before the deadline they don’t think they will.
  - nomel 3y ago
    I'm curious what happens if they actually do hit the targets, in 2 years.