phyllotaxis

6 ms·

1.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
I'm writing from a phone, unable to write with any depth. See this list of papers written on the topic http://public.lanl.gov/alp/plasma/papers.html
2.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/Bayes.pdf http://members.cox.net/dascott3/AppendixB.pdf http://members.cox.net/dascott3/IEEE-TransPlasmaSci-Scott-Au... http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/faint_quasars_give_conclus... http://www.halt
3.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
Look, I've been reading the same science you have been for 25 years. I have excitedly followed every development from Hawkings discovery of black holes to Feynmans physics work to all the various string theory, dark matter, red-shift big-ba
4.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
People like Galileo? Einstein? Maxwell? Crick? Pasteur? I apologize for offending sensibilies here. For those that are actually intellectually curious, I ask you to read the data. Read the data. Read the data. THEN make up your mind.
5.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
Flatline, read the site. Read the links. I would never spam this site with wacked out bullshit. Look past personality here and read the science of plasma and electricity explaining, repeatedly, many questions that the popular hypotheses sim
6.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
EDIT - WHY IS THIS STATEMENT DOWNVOTED? REALLY? There are huge flaws in the art as it is practiced today. They aren't finding what they're looking for because it IS NOT THERE. Go to the following site, and understand the gap between the f
7.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
How would you distinguish your approach from, say, StumbleUpon?
8.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
This 2 minute chat just rocked my world :)
9.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
This is my favorite read all week. Thank you! As an "idea writer" with plenty of notebooks around at all times to capture thought fairies, this is a freakin beautiful way to extend that practice and take it to many levels I hadn't even thou
10.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
Related: http://mobile.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/07...
11.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
I like what he says very much. Perhaps his title is a bit incendiary, but the principles he writes on are very lucid, and I found myself thinking hard about them. Excellent read.
12.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
The sentiment is unimpeachable- but the advice isn't. Get the education, and the perspective that come with it- absolutely. But it doesn't require a retreat to academia for several years to gain it anymore. The internet is the collective k
13.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
I really loved reading this. I'm in a similar boat, though not at the stage of recruiting anyone yet. Let me ask you this though: are you unconcerned about not having people in a face-to-face environment? I can't imagine working with someon
14.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
The question that pops out to me after reading your request is what is the role of these people ? Are you just looking for contract code, or co-founders? These are two fundamentally different people/groups, requiring two different aproach
15.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
Pursuit of government sponsorship is easier than convincing people to part with their hard earned money by persuasion. A government bureaucrat with a magic bank account called a "departmental budget" filled with other peoples money can be f
16.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
If you didn't bother yourself to read the article, why do you feel anything you have to say on the topic is relevant?
17.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
This guy is rather brilliant, methinks.
18.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
[Quote]TV didn't kill radio[\quote] Nope, but the internet is. (i work in radio, BTW) Can't happen soon enough, if you ask me.
19.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
I appreciate the point of this article. I have always felt that the entire purpose of music has been to pass emotion from one person to another in a defined, purposeful way. I hear songs from 20 years ago, and I am instantly transported to
20.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
For interested readers, further elaboration on some of the points raised in the article above can be found here. http://mises.org/daily/5437/What-We-Need-to-Know-about-Money
21.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
I think the most important and appropriate follow-up question is: should we focus so hard on dividing and compartmentalizing our relationships? What will all this filing and sequestering of attributes gain us in the lifetime picture? This
22.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
This should be read by anyone with the drive to make their own future. I believe passionately in building strong relationships with as many people you can- but having someone that truly shares your type of drive is rare. I think this artic
23.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
One vision is marketing. One is not. You decide which is which. I'm not being sarcastic at all- I wonder if marketing is targeting the low-hanging fruit if college-age kids because they're intuitively easy to imagine being "cutting edge". M
24.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
I like the way you think
25.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
"Dammit Jim, you're a celebrity, not a Wal-Mart greeter"
26.
Google Plus: Learning from Failure(mises.org)
11 points by phyllotaxis 15y ago|2 comments
27.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
My pleasure :) (maybe we'll get lucky and somebody else will develop it for us)
28.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
A game where you play Conventional Wisdom Slayer. I'm a fan already :) Shoot some green-smoothie bombs and vitamin D3 bullets at carcinogenic cosmetics and processed food-slimes. Hell yes. (The expansion packs into other false "common sens
29.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
I think you're on the right train of thought. One suggestion I would offer regards the intended result. How about taking the "set of selfish individual preferences" and route them go a variety of solutions both public and private? Instead
30.
by phyllotaxis 15y ago
I love the thought put into this, and I have done years of thinking on similar topics... but let me ask you a point-blank question: do you seriously- seriously - believe for one instant that clarity on majority desire would be any less ma

More ›