5 ms·

http://www.electric-cosmos.org/Bayes.pdf http://www.electric-cosmos.org/Bayes.pdf http://members.cox.net/dascott3/AppendixB.pdf http://members.cox.net/dascott3

http://www.electric-cosmos.org/Bayes.pdf http://www.electric-cosmos.org/Bayes.pdf http://members.cox.net/dascott3/AppendixB.pdf http://members.cox.net/dascott3/AppendixB.pdf http://members.cox.net/dascott3/IEEE-TransPlasmaSci-Scott-Aug2007.pdf http://members.cox.net/dascott3/IEEE-TransPlasmaSci-Scott-Au... http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/faint_quasars_give_conclusive_evidence_for_non_velocity_redshifts http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/faint_quasars_give_conclus... http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/the_observational_impetus_for_le_sage_gravity http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/the_observational_impetus_... http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/rebuttals http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/rebuttals

chc 15y ago
I clicked on one, and it was discouragingly bad. It pivots on the phrase "as the picture shows…" — which is a hallmark of crackpot claims, from Bigfoot to canals on Mars. The fact that two galaxies appear to be connected by "light" in a photograph is no more evidence that they are actually connected than a photo where the sun blows out a tree's leaves is proof that the sun is a small orb floating a few feet above the earth.