Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pdubs1
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
1.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Has anyone ever told you that you're "batch it crazy"?
2.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
I 2nd the 2nd point above. But I'd say: If you check out the ESP32, also checkout micropython. "ESP32 Tutorial using MicroPython - Let's Get Started!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QopRAwUP5ds A ESP32
3.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
>"men" Obligatory: "But you're leaving out women's historical involvement!" "The Women of Fly Tying OKAY BOYS, GET OVER IT: women have made some of the most important contributions in the fine art of fl
4.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Research -> Information -> Strategy. No one can build your strategy for you-- you'll want one suited for you, and no one knows you better than yourself. Although I am sure certain folks can help: Life Coaches, Counselors, Psycho
5.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
I taught myself IT skills while sleeping in a tent. If anyone wants it bad enough, they can also teach themselves IT skills. No need to bring classism into it-- Once someone teaches their self IT skills (while living homelessly, as I did),
6.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
>"The 'things vs people' dichotomy is extremely vague and obviously bullshit." Is it? Or have you simply not taken a moment to do a little bit of research? Here is a study with 500,000 participants, for example: "
7.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
>" you are acting like a jerk." you are acting like an intellectual weakling who resorts to ad hominems. constructive criticism = jerk, only in the mind of a a person behaving as a sensitive weakling.
8.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
This. This is super important to keep in mind. Thank you for the reminder. We have to remember that often, articles of "information" present themselves as such, when in reality, they're intentionally manipulative (in terms o
9.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Has anyone noticed how dissent in this thread has been flagged and quashed we must ask ourselves why what are they trying to hide
10.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Again, "See: Stress inoculation". Don't worry about one particular study. Search for The Concept. Deduce for yourself its validity.
11.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
There you go-- You've revealed your naïveté You are not objective-- you're human. That alone makes you are biased, apparently in particular towards prideful emotions especially when folks like myself expose your bias (such as tow
12.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
The ancient world exposed people to more stress and more events of stress compared to developed world inhabitants. More stress => get used to stress => stress has less of an effect. Just like any form of mental or physical training:
13.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
More specifically though, these are also neither "hacks" nor "secrets". I wouldn't even call them "tricks". "Tips", sure, makes sense.
14.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
No offense to the author-- These are not pro-tips. More like newbie-tips.
15.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
It also seems really dumb, to me, for incorporating "Love" into a business/engineering product/project stage-of-development naming convention. Any good business person or engineer understands that objective, unbiased, un
16.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Same here. This article just lost me respect for WP-Engine. What a pedantic, naive, intelligence-insulting article. It insults my intelligence to tell me what my "customers" want, given that they've never met my customers.
17.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
This article smells of a naive, inexperienced author. "I hate the accepted industry abbreviation. Use my abbreviation! It's better! Woo I'm so smart and and my opinion is so important." How about... I hate SLC. Use MVP
18.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Good to know. Thanks for sharing. Well, this definitely makes me think that it's best if I self-host my git repos starting at some point in the near future.
19.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
>"liberal conspiracy" Call it what you want. I don't know that the social engineering campaign was developed on one "side" or the other-- I assume its planning and implementation goes "deep"er than tha
20.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
>They're looking for an acquisition, maybe an IPO, and exploiting users (and even on-prem customers!) is clearly going to be part of that game plan. Could you elaborate? In what way are you aware that Gitlab is: - seeking acquisitio
21.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Uhh... I imagine it's different with each situation and product. But look-- if you're letting other people come in and define your vision for you... well, you're no longer doing management-- you're following someone else
22.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Re: Source 3 -- Here is a better view of one of the images in their article. It shows data for SJW-related buzz words-- word frequency over time. https://fee.org/media/34425/nyt.jpg
23.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
I would prefer if there was. I can go anywhere any get junk news. I come to HN for STEM/Tech & similar/related business news
24.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Ah gotcha. Hence I preceeded it with "I think..." Which part is not the case?
25.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
No worries, I just wanted to point out some things I felt were factual about my experience with A. happening upon at largely tech/stem-irrelevant news story and thinking "Gee, why is this here if it's not relevant? I want Tec
26.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
one word: crowdsource.
27.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Submitter MarkHall is also the article's author. Looking at his user history, he submits articles he writes here, despite their irrelevance to this community I don't see any value in this article posted here. 1. It's gen
28.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
There are various styles of communication (such as Direct and Indirect) and in various contexts (from highly technical, objective, to highly emotional, subjective) and with various focuses (mission oriented vs. exploratory brainstorming vs.
29.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
News flash: Women are more people-oriented while men are more thing-oriented, on average (1, 2). I don't think this is grounds for "All men should communicate like women" or "Women's style of communication is more p
30.
▲
by
pdubs1
6y ago
Here's an interesting summary of how usage of woke & SJW terminology dramatically increased in NYT publications since 2010 (alongside its increase in other forms of media). It's a "divide and conquer" social engineer
More ›