>"liberal conspiracy" Call it what you want. I don't know that the social engineering campaign was developed on one "side" or the other-- I assume its plannin

>"liberal conspiracy" Call it what you want. I don't know that the social engineering campaign was developed on one "side" or the other-- I assume its planning and implementation goes "deep"er than that, and pervades both sides of the aisle. Given the evidence, who questions whether or not there is a social engineering campaign? it's quite obvious to me. The "dots" connected for you: https://ibb.co/gj76Frc https://ibb.co/gj76Frc The "dots": [1] 1/n Spent some time on LexisNexis over the weekend. Depending on your political orientation, what follows will either disturb or encourage you. But regardless of political orientation, I'm sure we can all say 'holy fucking shit'" https://twitter.com/ZachG932/status/1133440945201061888 https://twitter.com/ZachG932/status/1133440945201061888 [2] The NYTimes is Woke "Many trends develop over decades but I’ve never seen change so rapid as the breathtaking success of what one might call social justice concerns. Beginning around 2010-2014 there appears to have been a inflection point. Here from Zach Goldberg on twitter are various words drawn from Lexis-Nexis." https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2019/06/the-nytimes-is-woke.html https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2019/06/th... [3] Discussion on how identity politics conveniently sprang up as a counter-movement to deliberately disrupt up the Occupy Wallstreet movement, which is corroborated by the timelines of sources 3 and 4 above. https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1wecyn/identity_politics_killed_occupy_wall_street/ https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1wecyn/identity...