Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
papachito
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
I think the most widely used database is sqlite.
2.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
That could be said for any artwork.
3.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
"Rich" countries have tiny birth rates compared to others, you can't ignore that fact by saying "people love making babies everywhere" (I live in Peru btw).
4.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Fossil SCM does not do one thing that does it right, it does many things actually, ticketing, wiki, scm and more I think.
5.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
As a matter of fact, the digital economy play a huge role in the 60% abot poverty rate. So it should matter to them.
6.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Have you kept at what KDE's done with WebKit before 2002 and what Google and many others have done with WebKit?
7.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
> or like one of Apple's arch-competitors is using Apple's open source code to compete with them WebKit is based on KHTML though from KDE, so not entirely Apple's. Not to mention that chrome uses V8 which is not JScore from Apple but fu
8.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Gruber is that you?
9.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
What are you talking about? Those backgrounds are beautiful especially those by Yann Arthus-Bertrand. As for Chrome's themes, they look fine to me.
10.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Even Googlers agree with Eran, xauth is just a temporary solution, the real solution should go into the browser, maybe with a API that is xauth compatible. Mozilla is already working on those ideas. edit, from another googler: http://www.g
11.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
.cl is for Chile.
12.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html
13.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
> So, SaaS is okay so long as the "risks" are sufficiently small? Who defines that risk, me? So that makes it okay for me to use Google Docs, since I deem the risk of Google doing something evil with my documents to be small? Yes, if yo
14.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Yes, because Admob doesn't work on Android which will soon have more market share than the iPhone ;)
15.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Here is his full opinion on SaaS http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-se...
16.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
> why is this TLD being allowed? Colombia?
17.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
I just type Ctrl+Enter to append the .com, works in chrome, ff and IE at least.
18.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
> Finally, we never let geography get in the way. We hire the best we can no matter where they are. We're based in Chicago, but we have programmers in Idaho and California, system administrators in North Carolina and downstate Illinois,
19.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Froyo is already much faster.
20.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
It does do browser sniffing, it works on his ubuntu because he's using firefox with the mplayer plugin that can read h264.
21.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
I'm on Linux too, I can't view Quicktime unless I install illegal codecs.
22.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
> They seem to use the video-tag in some cases (Safari, maybe Chrome) but not in others Not chrome, only Safari. So yes, this is basically the same thing as forcing flash as you either have to change the browser, get a new OS if you're
23.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Pretty ironic that their announcement about HTML5 on the download page is broken on most browsers: http://www.apple.com/safari screenshot: http://grab.by/4O3f
24.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Except these demos were not HTML5 http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/06/intellectual-honest...
25.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
> This age limit only matters if parental controls are enabled. You can then pick which apps can be used, based on their age limit (all of them, only 17+, …). Some OS apps like Safari get extra switches – you can explicitly decide wheth
26.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
> So, if I understand you correctly, Apple should decide what constitutes good parenting? It looks like they do actually, forbidding +17 year old to access the web. > It just seems so completely absurd and ridiculous to claim that
27.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
It's dumb because a web browser should not be considered as something allowed only to people of +17 year old.
28.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Why don't firefox and chrome have such a warning then? > If they're based in the US, maybe, but there is more to the Internet than just the US. I just think it's Apple acting overly prude like banning US political cartoons etc. Being su
29.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Really? Enabling parent control on the iPhone blocks both Safari and Opera which means no access to wikipedia and other amazing sources of education just because they may stumble on porn which can be found everywhere anyway? There's nothing
30.
▲
by
papachito
16y ago
Forbidding teens to get access to the internet is considered good parenting now?
More ›