panxyh

25 ms·

1.
by panxyh 1mo ago
This WILL spur arson.
2.
by panxyh 4mo ago
How about some common sense?
3.
by panxyh 4mo ago
All major car manufacturers do indeed have experience or access to experience in critical control design. The problem isn't in their abilities but in their choices.
4.
by panxyh 4mo ago
Yes, their purpose and usefulness is obvious. As a supplement. Mirrors should be left as they are.
5.
by panxyh 4mo ago
The discussion isn't as much about a common backing camera (which also falls under 'useful accessory' I mentioned), but about cameras replacing mirrors.
6.
by panxyh 4mo ago
> they have a century of experience with critical control design and placement that don't kill people Car manufacturers do too.
7.
by panxyh 4mo ago
Nothing to discuss here, the article is spot on. I doubt though that those top of the class manufacturers are this stupid. They are rather playing the stupidity of the common consumer.
8.
by panxyh 4mo ago
Rear view cameras might be better than mirrors in terms of field of view. This doesn't make them objectively better. Disadvantages are well argumented in the article. They are an useful accessory but shouldn't replace real vision
9.
by panxyh 6mo ago
Yes, of course they were smarter.
10.
by panxyh 9mo ago
All a malicious website has to do to be convincing is to have a more conventional landing page then? The disk and sudo mentioned are good enough clues, then you have the about .
11.
by panxyh 9mo ago
The outcome is visible and not up for discussion, so is the fact that this is a problem for the influencer. He's getting his compassionate nodding and emotional support in the comments over there. I agree that him being non-technical s
12.
by panxyh 10mo ago
The difference is wether the effect is intentional or not. "Non-technical" isn't an insult. What you call "well actually"ing is well within limits on a technical forum.
13.
by panxyh 10mo ago
Most people might think that someone doesn't need LLM for that.
14.
by panxyh 10mo ago
"We (...)"
15.
by panxyh 10mo ago
They should be educated, sure, but this can't be an education issue . Rather an issue of crappy upbringing and low intellect or, when it's a cultural thing, crappy culture.
16.
by panxyh 11mo ago
> Maybe we should just stop commenting about whether or not something is AI generated. It doesn't add anything to the discussion, and is a waste of time. Ok, sure! As for the rest, "excuse me if I'm wrong" is a very c
17.
by panxyh 11mo ago
> to me If it's absolute, then why add that? Mine "to me" gave me a different impression, but it being a "to me", I questioned, not accused. You perhaps recognize t0mas88 after all these years on HN. I don'
18.
by panxyh 11mo ago
I did. By apologising and making a question, not accusation. The commenter himself didn't seem hurt by it. I'd recommend raising your outrage threshold. I clearly am keeping this light hearted, while you go into fight mode becaus
19.
by panxyh 11mo ago
Oh, cheers then :) But regarding flight ability, wouldn't that be V2? I thought there exist conditions where V1 is well below rotation speed. Anyways, > to make sure you can stop before the end of the runway answers my main question
20.
by panxyh 11mo ago
I see now that it probably wasn't, but "nothing" is an overstatement. And knowledgeable and helpful responses can be AI, so there might be a fallacy somewhere in your offence-taking. Are you offended when people do that in
21.
by panxyh 11mo ago
> abort safely That's what I'm getting at. I want to abort unsafely. Imagine 400 meters of grass field after the end of the runway, and a water body. I'm asking wether such factors are accounted for, or if plane on ground
22.
by panxyh 11mo ago
Isn't there any margin? Does it calculate stopping before end of runway or before causing damage? Surely uncertainty about the situation contributes to defaulting to committing, but what if it's a passenger plane and at V1 pilots
23.
by panxyh 11mo ago
Traditionally, software engineers are smart people
24.
by panxyh 11mo ago
GP wasn't complaining.
25.
by panxyh 1y ago
Well if he'd make a deep assumption you'd be even more triggered.
26.
by panxyh 1y ago
'Conservatives' is a label that you put on people whose views are currently seen as conservative. If there is a wild part at all then it isn't that 'they' are saying it, but what we came to view as conservative. I
27.
by panxyh 1y ago
What a shallow, copy-paste response. His statement was about a certain, obviously real tendency in general, existence of which is reasonable to assume there is enough research about. He objected not to the unlikelihood of an accidental mani
28.
by panxyh 1y ago
Because people are lazy.
29.
by panxyh 1y ago
Let him. But your or anyones enjoyment isn't a greater good. NTSBs work is important. He's an entertainer of curiosity.
30.
by panxyh 1y ago
What do you mean with the cursor question?

More ›