ojo-rojo

6 ms·

1.
by ojo-rojo 12d ago
Right. Once we see AI start delivering on the creative & intuition side of things that's going to be awesome. Until then I guess we'll live with exhaustive exploration of problem spaces by orchestrating swarms of agents...?
2.
by ojo-rojo 12d ago
I'm really impressed by mathematicians. It's cool that Fermat had the intuition to conjecture that "aⁿ + bⁿ = cⁿ" could not be satisfied for n > 2, and that other mathematicians can create proofs, and that others stil
3.
by ojo-rojo 25d ago
> My view is that these sorts of things are not possible for AI in general. I wonder what it would take build an artificial system that has these qualities. > Software deals with metaphors. This is me wondering again: what's fund
4.
by ojo-rojo 25d ago
I'm in the same boat, I think some aspects can be engineered, like intention and desire. I'm really curious if it's possible to go the full distance and make AI have experience like we do.
5.
by ojo-rojo 26d ago
> it can't jump to somewhere where it's not present its training data That sounds like something that can be engineered, can't it? In other words, we can identify limitations in current transformer-based architectures, an
6.
by ojo-rojo 26d ago
You mention LLMs are dead and don't have the complexity or inner life that people do. Is your opinion that these kinds of things are not possible for AI in general, or that these things might be possible but we're just not there
7.
by ojo-rojo 3mo ago
Ha, this is very true. When this happens I have to tell myself "Okay, time to wait out yet another story"
8.
by ojo-rojo 7mo ago
How about a subsequent review where a separate agent analyzes the original issue and resultant code and approves it if the code meets the intent of the issue. The principle being to keep an eye out for manual work that you can describe wel
9.
by ojo-rojo 8mo ago
This is my first time hearing the British don't like saying Celtic. (I'm from the U.S.) There must be some history there?
10.
by ojo-rojo 8mo ago
It's humbling to think about all the things people have gone through over the past couple hundred thousand years. Somewhere around 117 billion humans have ever lived...? It makes it seem kind of small when we think only 50 or 100 yea
11.
by ojo-rojo 8mo ago
I agree with you. I clicked into this hoping to hear what new things we could learn or discover with the new observatories. Commenting on the more positive and informative side would be a better use of time and energy I think :)
12.
by ojo-rojo 9mo ago
Ha, you made me think of casually referring to xkcd's by number just as we did with RFC's back in the day. "I don't know, the socket states seem to follow RFC 793, but remember it's a 1918 address on the southside o
13.
by ojo-rojo 9mo ago
Can you share some details? Do you disconnect while in your hometown going about your daily routine, or do you have this down time in a different environment? I'm kind of looking for inspiration. I have grown kids and friends that I
14.
by ojo-rojo 9mo ago
I notice when its left hand came down there was a squirt of water from probably crushing water bottle. That makes me wonder how much force these robots can exert, and if they can accidentally hurt people.
15.
by ojo-rojo 10mo ago
Probably from deconstructing the solar system's asteroids and planets. I imagine a Dyson sphere would be less structurally sound and harder to get right – due to gravitational forces on the material – than a Dyson swarm or matryoshka
16.
by ojo-rojo 10mo ago
Early as in we may have developed before any other civilizations? That's interesting. We're speculating of course, but what would explain us being the first after so much time – 13.8 billion years?
17.
by ojo-rojo 11mo ago
This is new to me. Thank you!
18.
by ojo-rojo 11mo ago
I'm interested in what you changed in your diet that helped. Would you be open to sharing? (I'm vegetarian, and eat a lot of salty and sugary foods I'm not too proud of, and would love to learn what works for other people.)
19.
by ojo-rojo 11mo ago
+1 To add to the experience of connecting to people, I can also imagine our family members taking a photograph together while in VR of the family living room – a memento we can take away. That would work if our VR avatars are realistic rep
20.
by ojo-rojo 1y ago
Yeah, I'm still confused.
21.
by ojo-rojo 1y ago
I like this sharing of the joy of journaling, thanks for that. I don't quite like the formula described here, though. I would imagine that following a set of questions would make it feel like filling out a templated form – too struct
22.
by ojo-rojo 1y ago
I find your comment interesting, even though I'm not sure if I really get what you're saying. You built a perpetual motion machine? You then made improvements? Can you share details?
23.
by ojo-rojo 1y ago
Can you say more? What are you using now?
24.
by ojo-rojo 1y ago
Thanks for sharing this. I've often felt that the ease by which we can erase digital content makes our time period susceptible to a digital dark ages to archaeologists studying history a few thousand years from now. Us preserving digi
25.
by ojo-rojo 1y ago
But that means we'd prefer whichever theory our species had landed on first. Basing our preference for a theory on that timing seems kind of arbitrary to me. If they're the same in other respects, I'd take a look at both si
26.
by ojo-rojo 1y ago
Ahh, The Last Question. This has a special place in my heart :)
27.
by ojo-rojo 1y ago
>One day this February, I just got up at 2am and started writing code. I was tired of waiting. So I wrote and wrote and wrote. That's cool. It makes me feel happy reading this, kind of inspiring :) >I found myself making an API
28.
by ojo-rojo 1y ago
"I'll be your huckleberry" – a great line in a tense scene.
29.
by ojo-rojo 2y ago
That's what I missed. Very very nice to see the detailed photos.
30.
by ojo-rojo 2y ago
The painting is described in detail, but there is no photograph of it. Isn't that strange? Did I miss a link somewhere?

More ›