Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
notdrunkatall
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
The welfare system in Sweden IS seen as a massive success because it HAS been a massive success, and didn't have many serious problems because people respected it as a temporary thing, and receiving welfare came with a social stigma.
2.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
Which is more ridiculous: that AMC actually called the FBI, or that the FBI actually respond in this way? What the fuck is wrong with this country?
3.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
You have my position wrong. You people suck at this.
4.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
The right thing to do would be to test the idea before shoving it down voters' throats. It would not only be morally correct, it would provide great ammunition for fighting against those who would be against it. But that's not g
5.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
Is it a shocker that I misread that table? Obviously, you meant that facetiously, suggesting that you believe that someone who espouses views contrary to popular liberal ideology is necessarily a stupid person. But the fact that I made
6.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
I would like to volunteer myself to slap the shit out of everyone with this mindset.
7.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
As a Swede, you're shockingly uninformed. https://www.google.com/search?q=sweden+welfare+immigration&o...
8.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
Do you know what the Swedes didn't have a problem with a decade ago? Welfare abuse. All of a sudden, they have a problem with it now. Do you know who are the ones abusing the system? Hint: it's not the Swedes. Every other coun
9.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
Forgive me for offending your politically correct sensibilities, but it seems that I'm going to have to be even more blunt: if you want to convince white people in this country that doling out free money to the poor is a good idea, you
10.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
Dependence. Turns out that when you incentivize something, you get more of it. Who knew?
11.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
Correction: this is what happens when poor Cherokee receive a stipend, but let's not pretend that the Cherokee are the ones we're worried about here. There are differences between the subcultures, and those differences almost c
12.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
Excuses. Everyone has nothing but excuses.
13.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
People who speak about things which they know nothing about are the worst kind of fools.
14.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
The withering of mechanisms to effect change follows directly from apathy. Conversely, those mechanisms flourish with the existence of an engaged, informed citizenry. We have no one to blame for the current state of affairs but ourselves.
15.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
Incentives incentivize things; who knew?
16.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
That's because the rest of you don't understand what an all-out financial collapse would mean for you because as a result of the FED's actions, it didn't happen.
17.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
It's refreshing to find someone who gets it.
18.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
Do you even marketing, somewhat obtuse bro?
19.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
I'm a fan of Snowden, but I agree. He needs to be more selective in what he releases.
20.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
It would certainly make me happier.
21.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
YOUR FACE IS STUPID!!!
22.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
>He stated "doing jobs white people don't like doing." How do you interpret this? This is, by definition, stating that by being white alone, the population carries a characteristic. Only if you're a twat. He was makin
23.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
>Nice casual racism. That's not racism. >While I question the notion of a "clash of civilisations[sic]," you're saying this like it's a bad thing. I don't see where he assigned a value to this prediction.
24.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
It's the first day.
25.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
Your 'potential threat' level with the NSA has risen from 10 to 9.
26.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
...except you're wrong. Bitcoin participants have developed a solution to the 51% problem, without any regulation, without any government stepping in and telling anyone to do anything. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/G
27.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
I've been resisting getting a smartphone for years because I didn't want to either pay $300+ for a phone or $80+ per month with one of the big carriers. Then a couple of weeks ago, someone on an HN thread told me about the Nokia L
28.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
>You're saying a black person who grows up in a white subculture then is less at risk of poverty? I call bullshit on that. Do you mean they're less at risk of poverty than a black person who grows up in typical black subculture
29.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
My definition of work is most certainly NOT worthless! "Work" is what produces the interesting books, the couches they sit on, the lights and heat which keep them warm, the houses, and everything else they depend on, ad infinitum
30.
▲
by
notdrunkatall
13y ago
We're talking about basic income here, not increasing housing available to people under the poverty line. The data isn't available, at least not where you've said it was.
More ›