6 ms·

>Nice casual racism. That's not racism. >While I question the notion of a "clash of civilisations[sic]," you're saying this like it's a bad thing. I don't se

• mjolk 13y ago
  >That's not racism. He stated "doing jobs white people don't like doing." How do you interpret this? This is, by definition, stating that by being white alone, the population carries a characteristic. >I don't see where he assigned a value to this prediction. They're independent clauses ("I question that this event is occurring _and_ it seems as if by the preposition 'as a taxpayer', you expect a little theatrics instead of quiet aversion of harm.").
  • notdrunkatall 13y ago
    >He stated "doing jobs white people don't like doing." How do you interpret this? This is, by definition, stating that by being white alone, the population carries a characteristic. Only if you're a twat. He was making a general observation: that minorities tend to do jobs that white people don't want to do. And he's right. That's a simple observation, one which carries no value judgment. It just is. That's not being racist; it's making an observation. If you think that any statement which differentiates between the races in any way - even if only tangentially - is a racist statement, then frankly, you need to get over yourself.
    • mjolk 13y ago
      >Only if you're a twat... you need to get over yourself. You're adorable. You must be the life of parties.
      • notdrunkatall 13y ago
        YOUR FACE IS STUPID!!!