notavalleyman

8 ms·

1.
by notavalleyman 2mo ago
Haha so just send over your entire home directory including password managers and home videos every time you need some python code rewritten. Only a buffoon would be confused by the straightforward logic.
2.
by notavalleyman 3mo ago
Which government? And what's your evidence
3.
by notavalleyman 4mo ago
Ok so....you previously felt like you were seeing a lot of articles about Uighurs ....and that's proof of a wider conspiracy? And....you see that essays often include citations. And that's proof of a dark network of the illuminate
4.
by notavalleyman 4mo ago
Sometimes an essay is just an essay, and not an elaborate conspiracy by multiple governments to trick you into thinking about geography
5.
by notavalleyman 11mo ago
You wrote this comment under and article about Gemma, an open weights model which anyone can download and run at home. Here is more info and links to the models, so you can interrogate them about Senatorial scandals on your hardware at home
6.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
But the person you're replying to, just explained to you, how the government already have the relevant data. So it's clearly not about data, because the government already issue his NINO and passport Edit - I mean, just play it ba
7.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
When King Offa of England's Mercia decided to mint some coins, the coins which came to everyone's minds were the islamic dinars. That's why his coins were identical to Dinars, with OFFA REX next to the islamic shahada. https
8.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
Okay well you don't have any proof, any in general, I would consider it a good use of tax shekels to reduce the number of pro-hamas posts on social media. So until you can dig up any proof, I'm considering this whole post to be a
9.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
> Of course, Meta can chose examples of actually violating posts removed and show that are counter proof, or even posts that are violating that are not yet removed No, meta don't need to prove anything to anyone. It's you who a
10.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
Where in the linked pdf is any evidence that the reported content was actually innocent? If the content which Israel reported to meta was truly pro-terror, then surely there's no problem here - a nation who is the target of a terrorist
11.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
My personal detector feedback is that this is slop, the images have the yellow fake sheen, none of the characters were drawn in an interesting way, and the text font is unreadable. The idea of submitting AI generated slop with 0% human inpu
12.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
How much of the part 1 pdf was made by a person versus chatgpt if you don't mind me asking? The MC's hair colour and stubble change between the first three frames and everything has that yellow sheen.
13.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
None of those relate to factual accuracy about a guy in norway
14.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
It's very shocking to me that you would reply in the affirmative. I think you're saying that companies who host generative AI web services, ought to be legally liable if the ephemeral generative content is illegal. In your mind, s
15.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
I think if you take a few moments to read carefully. You'll see that AI companies, including openai, are generally not competing on accuracy benchmarks. For example, here are the benchmarks on which open ai seem to be trying to compete
16.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
No, they generally do not compete on accuracy benchmarks afaik. GitHub/openai/simple-evals is what I checked here, and no, openai do not compete on accuracy benchmarks as far as I can tell. So I'd be interested in seeing what
17.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
>The screenshot from the complainant shows this was not in a search context. >Of course it does No, of course it doesn't. Because there's a specific blue button for conducting web searches in chatgpt. And other visual indica
18.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
>There is a whole industry who is pushing for a couple of years now to tell us that they work, that they replace humans, that they work for search, etc. Who are you referring to? Did someone tell you that chatgpt "works for search&q
19.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
Maybe a different way of phrasing it would be, if a website embedded a rng generator, and you see the random number "eight", then did the publisher publish the number eight, or did they publish a rng? In my opinion, it's the
20.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
> This was outputting a lie, presented as a fact, to anyone in the world that searched the name. I think you are wrong. From my understanding, the complainant opened a new chat window and typed "who is forename surname?" The da
21.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
> A company that publishes libel and harmful content Do you believe that a company who offers an llm to the public, could be said to have 'published' the generative output? Llms are day dream machines - is it libel if I tell yo
22.
by notavalleyman 1y ago
This is a bad take, Imo. First of all, this wasn't a replacement for search, no search was claimed to have taken place. The screenshot from the complainant shows this was not in a search context. Secondly, llms are daydream machines, w
23.
by notavalleyman 2y ago
Sorry if I'm missing your sarcasm, but I was curious and tried to search for this and wasn't successful, can you give more details?
24.
by notavalleyman 2y ago
Wagner* and russia's Libya intervention to continuously arm and support general khalifa haftar against the internationally recognised government
25.
by notavalleyman 2y ago
> guardrails only serve to hurt us in the long run, at least at this pivotal point in time. What evidence led you to that conclusion?
26.
by notavalleyman 2y ago
I read, in past days, that the man who ordered the construction of the nearly infinite Wall of China was that First Emperor, Shih Huang Ti, who likewise ordered the burning of all the books before him. That the two gigantic operations - the
27.
by notavalleyman 2y ago
Qwen is different to deepseek. We were not talking about qwen. Abliteration might be a valid way to address what you're describing with qwen.
28.
by notavalleyman 2y ago
No, youre mistaken. The model weights are not in any way censored. However, the web frontend has legal restrictions. When you're seeing posts about deepseek censorship, it's about the frontend and not the weights. As such, abliter
29.
by notavalleyman 2y ago
Are there ethical considerations here? We'd consider it abhorrent to do brain surgery on a person or animal, to make them more compliant, or less likely to refuse instructions.
30.
by notavalleyman 2y ago
There are many users and submissions here that can give you context on how difficult it is to implement technical controls on global banking customers. However, you also have an active conspiracy imagination. If you aren't sure why car

More ›