nifoc

8 ms·

1.
Erlang/OTP 29.0(erlang.org)
7 points by nifoc 4mo ago|0 comments
2.
Erlang/OTP 27.0 Release(erlang.org)
66 points by nifoc 2y ago|3 comments
3.
by nifoc 3y ago
So it looks like they will be collecting PII (user_ipaddress) and they will also link these events to an account (account_uuid) and you just have to trust their "de-identification pipeline". Will be interesting to see if they roll
4.
by nifoc 3y ago
I used to have a (long) list of posts/comments that they refused to remove after I reported them. Most of these were (at least to me) _very_ obvious cases of being against the TOS (and the law). I messaged this list to the admins. I em
5.
by nifoc 3y ago
Highlights blog: https://www.erlang.org/blog/otp-26-highlights/
6.
Erlang/OTP 26.0 Release(erlang.org)
4 points by nifoc 3y ago|1 comments
7.
by nifoc 4y ago
I very strongly feel like this really should be opt-in instead of opt-out. They seem to want to do things the right way, but having opt-out telemetry in a password manager is something I really do not want.
8.
by nifoc 4y ago
And since Bing rasing prices affects their price so much, I'd argue that Kagi isn't investing enough into their own crawler/index, so that they can ultimately bring down the price of search. Instead they're integrating y
9.
by nifoc 4y ago
They have updated the FAQ section of the announcement to directly address this (very, very valid) point: > Q. Didn’t you say in September that current subscibers will be grandfathered in? > A. Yes we did say that in September. We are
10.
by nifoc 4y ago
Back in September they promised this[1]: > If such change to Individual plans is to occur, we plan to grandfather-in all early adopters (meaning all current and future paid customers, up until this change) allowing them to keep their exi
11.
by nifoc 4y ago
I'm a happy Kagi customer, but going from $10/mo to $25/mo seems like a very steep increase. (I realize that much of it is probably driven by Bing more than doubling the price for their API results.) One thing that feels kind
12.
Security Audit of Git(x41-dsec.de)
2 points by nifoc 4y ago|0 comments
13.
by nifoc 4y ago
Highlights: https://www.erlang.org/blog/my-otp-25-highlights/
14.
Erlang/OTP 25.0 Release(erlang.org)
212 points by nifoc 4y ago|121 comments
15.
by nifoc 5y ago
I don't know what's going on over at 1Password, but some of their decisions/statements are really questionable. A month ago they dropped this[1] in response to the 1PW 8 beta feedback: > I also wanted to respond to a speci
16.
Erlang/OTP 24 highlights(blog.erlang.org)
454 points by nifoc 5y ago|100 comments
17.
Pwning an online retailer via public .git directory(jomo.tv)
3 points by nifoc 6y ago|1 comments
18.
Elixir 1.11(elixir-lang.org)
381 points by nifoc 6y ago|101 comments
19.
Apple hosts blocked by Google Safebrowsing(github.com)
1 points by nifoc 6y ago|0 comments
20.
OTP 23(erlang.org)
395 points by nifoc 6y ago|119 comments
21.
Netgate / pfSense acts in bad faith(opnsense.org)
8 points by nifoc 9y ago|1 comments
22.
Rclone has been banned from Amazon Drive(forum.rclone.org)
3 points by nifoc 9y ago|0 comments
23.
It looks like rclone has been banned on Amazon Cloud Drive(twitter.com)
28 points by nifoc 9y ago|7 comments
24.
by nifoc 11y ago
Non-paywalled article: http://www.securityweek.com/cisco-acquire-opendns-635-millio...
25.
by nifoc 11y ago
SSH under OS X uses OSSLShim, which is wrapper around Secure Transport. I'm not exactly sure when they started using it for this, but it has been a while. If you're seeing OpenSSL in the output, you have probably installed SSH via
26.
Joyent Moves to Establish Node.js Foundation(joyent.com)
215 points by nifoc 12y ago|153 comments
27.
by nifoc 12y ago
> Consider migrating to BSD, Plan 9 or something similar, if things get really out of hand. I can understand suggesting to migrate to BSD, but Plan 9? Seriously? And what's the purpose of the "Open Source Tea Party" pictur
28.
by nifoc 13y ago
The UI (and maybe other parts?) of AVM routers ("FritzBox") is written in Lua.
29.
by nifoc 14y ago
I'm under the impression that the Sprockets regression should not affect you in production, because your assets are precompiled. Is that not the case?
30.
by nifoc 14y ago
How is this > […] handing that task to Sprockets instead of resolving internally […] even remotely related to performance issues because of random routing? You're mixing two issues that have nothing in common.

More ›