neuroelectronic

4 ms·

1.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
I think you're just confused.
2.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
He was calling out notable exceptions... | but it's infrequent to meet one whose wealth wasn't acquired through direct or indirect participation in the financial and banking industries.
3.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
I guess you're leaving the actual comparison as an exercise for the reader. IIRC, both involved people who had little business savvy and a missed opportunity presented as a regretful decision. no money is exchanged here however, and they
4.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
Yes, but they still pay you as if they charged full price. Sounds like a pretty good deal to me. The description thing is just odd though.
5.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
I'm pretty sure this is dramatized to fish for more sales.
6.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
He definitely is. The developers definitely should get paid 20% of their asking price for free downloads because some people think that's what happens. Amazon should definitely be responsible of their perception in the eyes of a few niave
7.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
Nobody would buy an app from a developer who did this.
8.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
I don't know, but hear it is.
9.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
What a joke. No wonder this game is taking so long to release. Creating a global marketplace like this is a serious development effort. This isn't a game anymore.
10.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
obviously in such a small (in terms of computing in general) discipline, a general purpose language might not be the best. Now if you want to publish your results to AWS and a website and pull data from a website front-end, etc. You can pr
11.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
Challenge accepted.
12.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
Interesting approach, but the problem here is Apple doesn't sell books on iPhone (or rather 3rd parties do and they don't do a very good job of it). This is more like a retroactive, me-to I want that market move. The Kindle app product is
13.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
| If they have their own bookstore they're trying to run why should they enable a competitor's in their own home? If Microsoft spent so much on R&D for Windows 95 and IE, why shouldn't they build it into the OS? Why shouldn't they lock
14.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
Did they hire Apple for this?
15.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
Did he ever manage to republish the articles? Doesn't look like it.
16.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
I also read the patents, and to me, it sounds like Apple has patented both the smart phone, and applications that use a network.
17.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
You can use the web player through safari.
18.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
I think it's generally accepted at this point that the WSJ has become the conservative mouthpiece of Murdoch since it's acqusition in 2007.
19.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
Circle jerk reddit posts on HN?
20.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
You are delusional. any data? Facebook doesn't sell any user data? Not only do they sell user metrics, they sell actuall user generated content.
21.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
There is a lot of things that Facebook won't do that Google+ can do. The reason managing friends lists in Facebook is so god-awfull is because Facebook wants it to be. There is also several other interface eccentricities put there to mak
22.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
Ok, because the implied situation in the article is the LightSquared is pooping all over the GPS spectrum and then selling licences to manufactures for their spiffy new GPS service which happens to work much better than old GPS now.
23.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
All of the above, plus a couple of more. (Do SQL-ish caches count? no matter still a few more)
24.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
That's my entire point though! They seem to think that they are a "utility" that deserves a "natural monopoly" status, in the meantime, they continue to inovate and compete, often unfairly, to both taxpayers and buisnesses.
25.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
WebOS/Palm/HP did a very good job of this. WebOS was far more productive than iPhone at the time. Nobody would have known though because it wasn't Apple . It came on cheaply made devices and had a skunkworks feel to it.
26.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
That's not the whole point of an array, an array also has practical uses!
27.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
lol football
28.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
IMHO, they should just get out of the media game and focus on their network as a service. If they are going to play the "natural monopoly" card then they need to act like it and not be buying up media outlets. It's incredible that nobody
29.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
Apple R&D: finding exactly what they're looking for since 1989
30.
by neuroelectronic 15y ago
Building a datacenter doesn't make you a datacenter expert. I'm not saying that Apple can't do it, just that they're not going to be able to do it as well as Windows or Amazon.

More ›