nessbot

5 ms·

1.
by nessbot 7mo ago
Yeah, not denying the bribing. But that doesn't change tax law. It still needsto be passed by congress. Does it affect enforcement, though? maybe
2.
by nessbot 7mo ago
Can one "cut a deal" with the IRS without it ending up in legislation (i.e. tax law)?
3.
by nessbot 7mo ago
Murdering buses of people doesn't bring the full force of the US military on them. The difference is the risk not the depravity.
4.
by nessbot 8mo ago
He's not just the leader, he's the primary beneficiary, and he's a blatant white supremacist. He's arguably responsible for the deaths of over 1 million people world wide from his short tenure shutting down USAID[0]. So
5.
by nessbot 1y ago
You're the one who made the claim. Do you have examples?
6.
by nessbot 1y ago
Pleas name a website the government has shut down over bias.
7.
by nessbot 1y ago
Yeah that'd be a very easy 1A case.
8.
by nessbot 1y ago
I mean it is a "a pejorative term used to describe negative reactions to U.S. President Donald Trump..." How is having a page for that biased. And this is coming from some who has been described in the past (not anymore) of havin
9.
by nessbot 1y ago
Do bat's know what senses humans have? Or have the concept of what a human is compared to other organisms or moving objects? What is this analogy?
10.
by nessbot 1y ago
any of those pullin a profit?
11.
by nessbot 1y ago
Where's the big in-production use of this stuff in business that is making money and selling a product people use?
12.
by nessbot 1y ago
I don't want to be too inflammatory but seeing comments like this are what's poisoning AI to me more than the crappy products themselves. Of course the apology would suggest that, it would be business malpractice not to. However
13.
by nessbot 1y ago
technology doesn't just advance itself
14.
by nessbot 1y ago
That didn't answer the question but just repeat the original claim differently. Where are they getting those numbers?
15.
by nessbot 1y ago
But it knows what you're querying, which depending on what you're doing may also give away a good bit about whats in the DB.
16.
by nessbot 1y ago
No. I said "by definition" which means based on the meaning of the word not the context.
17.
by nessbot 1y ago
I didn't say it was or was not unreasonable, I said it was surveillance by definition (i.e. based on what the world means).
18.
by nessbot 1y ago
I mean regardless of whether it has value in being used, it's pretty much, by definition, "surveillance tech."
19.
by nessbot 1y ago
Not if they only way you know how to code is vibe coding.
20.
by nessbot 1y ago
Yeah I get personally being worried but it's a weird thing to post online because the implication shared is that it'd be better if he [was allowed to]* just abuse emergency powers. *edit
21.
by nessbot 1y ago
So he gets to flaunt the law because he's vindictive? Not a system I wanna live in.
22.
by nessbot 1y ago
and my comment said "own and control" and later focused on "control".
23.
by nessbot 1y ago
Good for them?
24.
by nessbot 1y ago
It's not a tool its a SaaS. I own and control my tools. I think a John Deer tractor looses it's "tool" status when you can't control it. Sure there's the local models but those aren't what the vast majo
25.
by nessbot 1y ago
Don't disagree, just saying it goes both ways. In your case you didn't care (not judging, I probably wouldn't either) about the opinions of the randos at the beach. However, in business, reputation does matter.
26.
by nessbot 1y ago
And don't mistreat peoples public data, and expect them to like or support you.
27.
by nessbot 1y ago
Sounds like the thought process behind this comment.
28.
by nessbot 1y ago
No fan of the RC church here but I didn't hear any mocking. Just pointing out a counterfactual experience.
29.
by nessbot 1y ago
You got a source for that? I've hear otherwise about some of the parent's decisions for their US citizen children.
30.
by nessbot 1y ago
The humans, but now with a boss that values them a little more.

More ›