ml-anon

8 ms·

1.
by ml-anon 3mo ago
they are literally burning billions of dollars and can presumably keep doing this for a while. Taking a trivial amount of additional financial liability to launder their reputation wouldn't meaningfully improve things.
2.
by ml-anon 3mo ago
there is this bullshit term you hear paraded about the dwarkesh-adjacent circles: "capability overhang". Aside from being effectively meaningless jargon, there is a kernel of an idea that somehow the models are far more capable th
3.
by ml-anon 6mo ago
lol imagine someone believing in the invisible hand of the free market in 2026
4.
by ml-anon 6mo ago
Honestly, how do people who know so little have this much confidence to post here?
5.
by ml-anon 6mo ago
ladies and gentlemen, the fucking state of hn.
6.
by ml-anon 6mo ago
Yes, this is utterly fucking bonkers.
7.
by ml-anon 6mo ago
have you heard of people not surviving into old age, or not being present or not being able to take care of kids? What the fuck is wrong with people in this comment section?
8.
by ml-anon 6mo ago
nah you're only speaking out of your ass
9.
by ml-anon 6mo ago
yeah, what the fuck? This comment section is utterly fucking insane.
10.
by ml-anon 6mo ago
Never has a website's title been so consistently wrong over such a large variety of subjects.
11.
by ml-anon 7mo ago
Colin Powell must be shaking vials of yellow powder in his grave right now.
12.
by ml-anon 7mo ago
Not to mention trafficking and raping children
13.
by ml-anon 7mo ago
It’s the fucking department of defense.
14.
by ml-anon 8mo ago
It’s also a way to distract from the fact that alleged pedophile and rapist Elon had 3 underaged foreign nationals trafficked to him at the space x headquarters by convinced pedophile and rapist Jeffrey Epstein, per the Epstein files.
15.
by ml-anon 9mo ago
So solve it?
16.
by ml-anon 9mo ago
No it’s not. It’s made up bullshit that arises for reasons that literally no one can formalize or reliably prevent. This is the exact opposite of specific.
17.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
ok so no evidence of highly illegal mass gender based discrimination.
18.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
lol title IX was only in the 70s. Post bechdel whatever, it was only a handful of years ago that women could finally speak out en masse about not being sexually assaulted on film and TV sets. Co-existence indeed.
19.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
Discrimination along protected attributes such as gender would be highly illegal though, so no doubt you’d have tons of evidence to present beyond “gossipy HR ladies”.
20.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
Yeah “society” had millennia of that. It’s quite telling that perhaps less than a decade of taking women seriously led to a a vitriol filled backlash full of Tates, Trumps and the manosphere. It’s also quite telling that your main complaint
21.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
Trying to claw ads market share using AI from the worlds number one ads and AI company.
22.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
You do not understand how online ads work. Please just stop.
23.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
You’re betting on OpenAI a company that has literally never sold an online ad against the two kings of online advertising…cool.
24.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
So few people understand how advertising on the internet works and that is I guess why Google and Meta basically print money. Even here the idea that it’s as simple as “just sell ads” is utterly laughable and yet it’s literally the mechanis
25.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
Anthropic have consistently shown they don’t know shit about anything but training LLMs. Why should we consider their political/sociological/ethical work to be anything other than garbage with no scholarly merit.
26.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
lolJEPA
27.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
Ding ding ding
28.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
it’s really unclear whether this is satire.
29.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
"prompt engineered"...i.e. by typing in what you want to see.
30.
by ml-anon 10mo ago
Couple of decades late with this news…

More ›