9 ms·
Discrimination along protected attributes such as gender would be highly illegal though, so no doubt you’d have tons of evidence to present beyond “gossipy HR l
by ml-anon 10mo ago
Discrimination along protected attributes such as gender would be highly illegal though, so no doubt you’d have tons of evidence to present beyond “gossipy HR ladies”.
- philipallstar 10mo agoI didn't mention gossip at all. Are you pretending to quote something I never said, to just perfectly illustrate the bad faith nonsense that is ever-injected into even simple conversations about this topic? It might be worth Googling James Damore as an early example of this chilling effect.
- ml-anon 10mo agook so no evidence of highly illegal mass gender based discrimination.
- lelanthran 10mo ago> ok so no evidence of highly illegal mass gender based discrimination. This seems like a very roundabout way of saying there was no evidence of discrimination against women :-/ Where are you going with this? Because if "no evidence == did not happen", then that's true for the decades prior to the 90s, right?