Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
misslibby
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
1.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
The principle is that nobody should be forced to employ somebody they don't want to employ. Right to be one's own boss: it is called freedom. It doesn't have to be written in the constitution with those exact words. I don
2.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
What does it have to do with the law of averages? It certainly has nothing to do with American history. It is a fundamental principle.
3.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
> American firms mostly simply did not hire black people until the law forced them to (especially to skilled-labor jobs). And the evidence that this restriction was primarily based on racial prejudice is overwhelming. Even if that was th
4.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
> I can't bridge the gap if we're not working from the same collection of facts, sorry. I wonder what your sources are? For sure black people were able to work throughout history. > Yes. That's literally what happened.
5.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
> This is an odd sentiment and I don't know what to make of it. I'm assuming you don't think only non-liberals can create a hostile work environment, so what do you mean? You claimed it would be easy to create non-toxic wo
6.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
> You just follow up on reports. That's what you do. And then you simply fire the non-liberals involved? Hostile work environment is usually people not getting along. I don't think that is usually easy to solve. You probably ha
7.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Iirc there was one event that might qualify as deception, when he claimed he already had funding secured from some entity and that made some other entity (the government?) also give him funding. That first entity ended up also giving him fu
8.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Most companies don't need lots of people. And setting their own work conditions is exactly what is at stake - which also impacts workers, as it also limits their choice of companies to work for. I also doubt wanting to make a lot of mo
9.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
You are incredible. 1.) he doesn't have to justify reinstating Trump at all. People who banned a sitting president have to justify their actions 2.) Seriously, what the fuck - you want to hold his dying child against him? This is ridic
10.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
I don't live in the US. What socialist like you keep forgetting is that somebody has to provide the jobs that you claim the rights to. If nobody provides the jobs, you can make laws all you want, people still won't have jobs.
11.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
> Freedom only for the owners of companies? Everybody can start a company - or should be allowed to, that is the point. Socialist rules making it difficult prevent people from becoming independent. > Or do you also respect the freedom
12.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
> Freedom to what, in this context? The freedom to work in the way they want. To escape the hamster wheel, for example by starting their own company with the conditions they prefer. > This is the "capitalism will solve it" a
13.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Of course the situations are comparable. Your only explanation was that there is a law for the one situation but (allegedly) not the other. Which probably isn't even true, as you may be able to sue people over insults (ianal). > As
14.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Lawsuits don't prove he lied.
15.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
People fret about the programming languages they use all the time...
16.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
The explanation is simple: freedom. People forget that when they curb the freedom of their employers, they also curb their own freedoms at the same time. They make sure that they can never escape from the hamster wheel. Of course most peopl
17.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
The usual list. He clearly isn't a leftist and it angers a lot of people very much that he doesn't automatically follow the leftist commands. Doesn't make him evil or a liar. And for example making a prediction that turns out
18.
▲
Klaus Teuber, inventor of Settlers Of Catan, has died
(faz.net)
1 points
by
misslibby
3y ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Doesn't sound like such a clear cut case. Has the court decided yet?
20.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
That's your opinion as a probably left leaning person. Other people may think differently. That such laws were passed 50 years ago does not prove that they were a net positive.
21.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Your argument was that "so and so did break the law". I answered that just because something is a law, it isn't good or correct. If you don't see the relevancy, I don't know what else to tell you. I don't think
22.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Maybe his colleagues didn't like Diaz much. I don't approve of such slurs, on the other hand, I am in favor of free speech and people being in charge of their own companies. Lousy lawyers - ianal, Musk said they were not allowed t
23.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Such as?
24.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Just because something is a law, doesn't imply it is good or justified.
25.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Musk has claimed on Twitter that Tesla wasn't allowed to present new evidence, and that the fine would have been 0 with the new evidence. But he says the jury did the best with the given evidence and he respects their decision. I think
26.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
I've never been awarded any money because somebody said something to me I didn't like. Yes words can have consequences. Let's take politics, some parties get elected based on their words, and then implement policies that are
27.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
Yeah but they can also live with a computer that costs 500$.
28.
▲
by
misslibby
3y ago
I would also not trust that number of 0.3% population growth. Were did you get it from? There are a lot of refugees from Ukraine, for example, which may have given prices another boost in the last year.
29.
▲
by
misslibby
4y ago
Is there a calculation as to how many hours would be lost spent on the road because of a speed limit? Like I don't know, say every day people spend a million hours driving on the highway, and a speed limit would bump it to 1.2 million
30.
▲
by
misslibby
4y ago
Haven't looked into the Twitter API in a long time, but this might just be badly implemented. They should have every user user their own API access code and their own rate limiting, not post everything via one account. At least it soun
More ›