Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mikkergp
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
I don’t think it’s that each of the elements of what Twitter does won’t be recreated, but the essence of Twitter, the je ne sais quio won’t. Whatever you want to call it, the town square we all participate in. It will be recreated in the
2.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
> It is unfortunate that so many are willing (and able) to willfully delude themselves into denying reality. Deny reality of what? I don’t really understand the rest of your post, I guess your alleging they government violated the first
3.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
>It is stunning to me that so many otherwise intelligent people do not see the problem with big tech colluding with government officials and intelligence agencies to brazenly attempt to distort and censor public discourse - especially ri
4.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
> every sphere of culture. Please clarify because absolutelutes are too easily disproven.
5.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
Yes exactly! They asked all the right questions then realized they didn’t have justification and it was a mistaken, apologize and I hope learned from the incident. And will react faster in the future. But this is the point. They made a
6.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
But your point is the point as to why it’s not hubris! they weren’t trying to censor anything, they were just trying to follow their own moderation policies. This I think is why the censorship story is such a non issue, because Twitter is
7.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
What did Twitter do to S&P?
8.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
> 97%+ Twitter employee donations were to Democrats? So what’s the principle here? What’s the plan. Which companies should have to disclose the political contributions of their employees and what should they do if it’s unbalanced at mor
9.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
Have they talked any further about releasing the algorithm? I know that was one of Musks goals
10.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
I saw that part and thought it was curious he glossed over it, I look forward to more detail in the future.
11.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
I didn’t read details about their apology, what makes you say that?
12.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
A day of deliberation is not a strong culture of censorship.
13.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
Pedophiles are bad period they’re a problem everywhere and it’s weird to try and make it partisan.
14.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
How long was she locked out for?
15.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
This part is weird, and it seems like there was an agreement between Musk and Matt not to smear Jack in this process. But if you really think there’s massive corruption at Twitter I don’t know how you think Jack should be absolved.
16.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
> . If Elon thinks this is some sort of big shock that will cause people to get excited.... I can't really see why. I don’t think he does, I think he can literally see engagement falling in the days after a stunt and he’s trying to
17.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
I agree with you, and I’m surprised Matt glossed over it. I think the question for me as a more government trusting person is; What is the difference between the government providing unique information, because of its potential Intelligenc
18.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
I mean, this is an event that lasted a day, they admitted their own mistakes, and they clearly deliberated over it. Like I agree with you in principal and could agree if they tried to keep it going, but they even said they should probably
19.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
Here’s the thing thought. So far the emails show a team making a mistake, and being thoughtful about it. Trying to look to their moderation principals and disagreeing about the path forward. Then, later we know Jack and Yoel and most of th
20.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
Except so far none of the emails have talked about political allegiance, they’ve all talked about Twitter policies.
21.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
Abuse of power by whom? Twitter or the Government?
22.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
So far Matt hasn’t said anything about this, where is the evidence to this theory? And who was doing this and how?
23.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
What’s the theory?
24.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
I don’t want SBF arrested for criminal trespass, I want him arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for the crimes he committed, and I don’t want him getting off because of the need for a speedy trial, before we know what h
25.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
"At the risk of stating the obvious, the reason Madoff was arrested so quickly is because he confessed to every element of criminal fraud — including both the underlying scheme and his criminal intent. This meant that the FBI had both
26.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
How are CSAM laws only somewhat justified?
27.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
> Symbols associated with credible calls to violence. This seems very squishy to me, I mean, fine, I don’t disagree, but it’s exactly the kind of thing old Twitter would be dragged for. Which symbols are “credible calls to violence” and
28.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
The world has become so weird. That elizableu person responded to one of her tweets 'Important to note, Elon Musk himself “liked” a tweet in this thread last night. If this information wasn’t valid, if it wasn’t factual, that wouldn’t
29.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
I think it would be the “cultural value” piece
30.
▲
by
mikkergp
4y ago
What is Parler's competitive advantage in the world of brave new Twitter? I think I've seen some pundits say Twitter is actually moderating less then Parler even.
More ›