michael9423

6 ms·

1.
by michael9423 5mo ago
That’s a great idea. Have you compared the effects of your product with non-modified soluble fibers? Afaik, soluble fibers not only from oats but also from vegetables and beans already have solid effects on toxin-binding in their natural st
2.
Fluoropolymers and nanomaterials, the invisible touchscreen hazards (2024)(link.springer.com)
2 points by michael9423 1y ago|0 comments
3.
by michael9423 2y ago
That does not make sense statistically. A decrease in total HFCS consumption would lead to a decrease in new diabetes cases if it was the actual root cause. Sugar is not the cause of diabetes.
4.
by michael9423 2y ago
I don't think you can speak for all vegans and vegetarians. I was vegetarian for a couple years until meat cravings became so strong I started eating meat again. 84% of vegans and vegetarians return to meat: https://www.psyc
5.
by michael9423 2y ago
Wind turbines do not produce a lot of energy in total so you need a lot of them. Thousands of tons of concrete are poured into the soil for the foundation of one wind turbine, and the foundation is likely never removed, creating ecological
6.
by michael9423 2y ago
The thing is that nuclear research has been stiffled for decades. It is possible to create nuclear reactors that consume their own waste.
7.
by michael9423 2y ago
This is considered 4th gen: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTR-PM
8.
by michael9423 2y ago
Here's the paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342671383_Metal_dis...
9.
by michael9423 2y ago
Yes, technically there is nothing that is 100% clean. But with nuclear and water, you more or less control the area of contamination and you don't have a permanent production of toxic waste that goes everywhere and is impossible to get
10.
by michael9423 2y ago
In my previous comment elsewhere that got flagged, I said, among other things, that the only clean sources of energy are nuclear and water. Solar panels are generally pretty toxic to the environment. Even the silicon panels contain lead. Th
11.
by michael9423 2y ago
How can he be sure he's a theoretical physicist if he doesn't know reality exists at all? The truth is, instead of reality, he would be better off questioning theoretical physics, which indeed does not exist outside the heads of a
12.
by michael9423 2y ago
Librewolf does #1 and #2 already. But generally, there's no market for that. Most of those who say "I would pay for that" would indeed never do it. Because those people want something very specific - something you can only ha
13.
by michael9423 2y ago
Brave does integrate uBO. It can be activated under "manifest v2 extensions" in the settings.
14.
by michael9423 2y ago
To clarify, my comment was directed at chatGPT itself, not your project.
15.
by michael9423 2y ago
I'm angry at ChatGPT and the like polluting the web, academia and people's minds.
16.
by michael9423 2y ago
It's not at all funny. It's dumb, and from the headline alone - "A dairy delight" - I already knew it was the lame and predictable ChatGPT language model with all it's repetitiveness, puns and consciously designed i
17.
by michael9423 2y ago
You know perfectly well that point 1 is completely irrelevant in the world of open-source. A UK Ltd. is less transparent than Librewolf, an open-source project run by many volunteers without the incentive to make any money. Point 3 is no lo
18.
by michael9423 2y ago
I think ads should not be allowed for anything at all in the digital world, including TV. In a world without ads, products would be known due to reputation. Ads are an assault on the limited resource of attention. People say how can new pro
19.
by michael9423 2y ago
> A single cow produces around 220 pounds of methane and around 200 pounds of ammonia per year. That's equivalent to 5ish gigatons of CO2, again per cow per year, so this really makes no sense. Ignoring the myth of harmful CO2 for a
20.
by michael9423 2y ago
Near me is a conservation area where agriculture is not allowed, but cattle grazes there all year round. It is sold locally. Plant-based food is often farmed on an industrial scale which pollutes the environment with glyphosate for example.
21.
by michael9423 2y ago
Thank you for that paper. It shows that the proposed negative effects of CO2 do not exist. Let's take the study by Rodeheffer. Even 15,000 ppm CO2 in the atmosphere did not change the results of a thorough 90-minute test. If this is no
22.
by michael9423 2y ago
> 1000 ppm is at the level where us apes have measurable reduction in reaction time and other cognitive impairments. The experiments that showed this were confusing correlation with causation. High CO2 in rooms is a marker of reduced O2,
23.
by michael9423 2y ago
The global greening does show that from the perspective of a healthy, fully greened planet, the CO2 concentrations are actually too low still. Plants favor a CO2 concentration of at least 1000 ppm. That's why in agriculture, extra CO2
24.
by michael9423 2y ago
Actually the article supports this information. The number is just a bit too high. Quote: "With the pledges from 2022 and the ongoing projects, the grant for cycle highways and the loan for the environmentally friendly bus system, Germ
25.
by michael9423 2y ago
drying and burning.
26.
by michael9423 2y ago
It seems to me that this is not a honest attempt by gorhill to actually adapt uBO to V3. Rather he wants to ridicule it. Adguard is working on an actual replacement of their Ad-Blocker that comes as close as possible to the V2-version: htt
27.
by michael9423 2y ago
Not really. If everyone would use a chromium version that radically blocks trackign and ads, google wouldn't control anything.
28.
by michael9423 2y ago
"This will be followed gradually in the coming months by the disabling of those extensions. Users will be directed to the Chrome Web Store, where they will be recommended Manifest V3 alternatives for their disabled extension." Soo
29.
by michael9423 2y ago
I don't think it's a good implementation. Takes up lots of space of the screen. Also: "With your permission, we will use AT internet and Hotjar cookies to produce aggregated, anonymous data about our visitors' browsing a
30.
by michael9423 2y ago
End users do not care about the browser engine. But as I said, Brave is trying. It won't be successful in the way FF could have been.

More ›