menacingly

9 ms·

1.
by menacingly 4mo ago
I don't understand how anyone is still primarily thinking about single-user scenarios in 2026
2.
by menacingly 2y ago
I don't know the particulars, but in general, silence around a massive tech company on warrants does not mean "they said no and the feds decided to leave them alone"
3.
by menacingly 2y ago
stuff like this working is why you get odd situations like "don't hallucinate" actually producing fewer hallucinations. it's to me one of the most interesting things about llms
4.
by menacingly 2y ago
they seemed to enjoy the internet access in russia
5.
by menacingly 2y ago
This is great!
6.
by menacingly 2y ago
sum the amount of "you simply <x>" in this thread, then account for the fact that we're talking about running afoul of a regulation if you don't understand it, and you end up with a hassle. I'm not weighing in
7.
by menacingly 2y ago
I'm surprised I don't see it more. You can't impose a regulatory burden more troublesome than your traffic is worth
8.
by menacingly 2y ago
Decentralized on centralized hardware?
9.
by menacingly 2y ago
could something like steam or a linux distro use it to distribute software? seems crazy not to. I think what people are saying is we know there is probably a silent line somewhere, and we have no way of knowing when we cross it. It feels li
10.
by menacingly 2y ago
I'm not sure selectively enforced shakedowns instill a lot of confidence either
11.
by menacingly 2y ago
unless I'm misunderstanding, the same data could be pulled from those services. the message content wasn't leaked here
12.
by menacingly 2y ago
You're only allowed to believe LLMs are a kind of digital messiah or that they're complete hype garbage, when of course the answer is some point between. There is obviously a lot of potential here, but there is also a lot of solut
13.
by menacingly 2y ago
it’s similar asking the gemini-1.5 models about coding questions that involve auth one of my questions about a login form also tripped a harassment flag
14.
by menacingly 2y ago
it will defer to the server a _lot_, if you just consider the capability they can fit on that phone
15.
by menacingly 2y ago
if the servers are so private, why is on-device such a win? here are some irrelevant distractions: - the cpu arch of the servers - mentioning that you have to trust vendors not to keep your data, then announcing a cloud architecture where y
16.
by menacingly 2y ago
microsoft was always going to take SMBs. Data is what makes them useful, so Microsoft keeps their SMBs, Apple gets consumers, Google gets their slice of productivity and android, where their preachy models will let you know if you did a har
17.
by menacingly 2y ago
The privacy conversation was pretty shady, and honestly full of technical holes with pointless misleading distractions
18.
by menacingly 2y ago
you should have seen them when they had a soul
19.
by menacingly 2y ago
it feels like microsoft showing off apple software
20.
by menacingly 2y ago
To a technical person, the discussion around AI felt really creepy and disingenuous, full of irrelevant distractions
21.
by menacingly 2y ago
this is the video form of "bug fixes and performance improvements", and about as charismatic
22.
by menacingly 2y ago
the more reasonable assumption is that it uses a third party crawl service. but still, it doesn't matter, it's acting on behalf of a user, and you aren't entitled to know what software your users run. One consequence of putti
23.
by menacingly 2y ago
we've all been there, go get 'em
24.
by menacingly 2y ago
I like the idea. Looks like you've got some kinks, happens to the best of us. I look forward to playing with it when you get those ironed out. Also, I don't care if you respect robots.txt.
25.
by menacingly 2y ago
it's because there is some sense among the physics-challenged that apple has to support it in hardware, as if we're a generation away from placing the burn-inducing, fusion-reactor-draining h100s in people's pocket it would t
26.
by menacingly 2y ago
that's a good point. it could also be the same reason everyone else is struggling: it's very hard to find compelling utility for LLMs. We absolutely will, but it's difficult. Right now everyone is setting incomprehensibly exp
27.
by menacingly 2y ago
if you frame "a creative" as people who select an emoji
28.
by menacingly 2y ago
That's certainly one of the available takes. Mine is that I'd need something other than some exuberant posts to think that's market essential at this point. Either it becomes an essential part of workflows, in which case it b
29.
by menacingly 2y ago
Apple isn't behind on AI any more than they were behind on cloud storage. It doesn't matter when, it doesn't matter if it isn't SOTA, I don't know how many different ways I can word that they have your data. Google
30.
by menacingly 2y ago
also if you're not trying to improve the security of your product by running random binaries from the internet. I'm concerned at the inability to separate the concepts of "what it does" and "what it says it does&quo

More ›