5 ms·
You're only allowed to believe LLMs are a kind of digital messiah or that they're complete hype garbage, when of course the answer is some point between. There
by menacingly 2y ago
You're only allowed to believe LLMs are a kind of digital messiah or that they're complete hype garbage, when of course the answer is some point between.
There is obviously a lot of potential here, but there is also a lot of solution looking for a problem.
My current red flag is if an argument hinges on a trademark breathless frisson for the growth potential. Statements like "models are getting smarter every month" that hasn't been true for a year. If your excitement over AI is based not on what we can do today, but a presumed future expansion for which we have no evidence, that's silly.
But what they can do today is cool. We worked for a long time to get computers to understand natural language intent, and LLMs demonstrably solve this problem.
- hi-v-rocknroll 2y agoIt's going to take much longer and more human(?) effort to apply DL/LLMs in worthy applications by adding constraints and human-injected workarounds to make them work with more useful and fewer unpleasant surprises.