7 ms·
No idea what you are missing and yes, Opus is quite solid, but Fable is clearly way better for me. I just did a direct comparison, big change in a quite comple
by lukan 4d ago
No idea what you are missing and yes, Opus is quite solid, but Fable is clearly way better for me.
I just did a direct comparison, big change in a quite complex codebase. Same prompt for Opus, same for Fable. Fable clearly won and delivered very good results, while Opus delivered mediocre, so I did not let it finish. I expected both to fail and was prepared to do lots of manual steering, but not necessary with Fable one shotting it, and all this with 35$ of credits for fable. I am still impressed. If I would have had to hire a human, it would have cost me thousands of dollar for the same task - and a way longer time. So maybe the valuations are overblown, but they clearly provide value for me.
- ipaddr 4d ago"Opus delivered mediocre, so I did not let it finish" Mediocre means average / middle of the pack. It sounds like its doing exactly what you would expect nothing more. Why would you stop it? Why would you need exceptional?
- BoiledCabbage 4d ago> mediocre - of moderate or low quality, value, ability, or performance https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mediocre https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mediocre Clearly they were using the word to mean low quality. Why would you ask this odd question?
- ipaddr 3d agoCore meaning: Barely adequate, average, or just acceptable. Mediocre means of only ordinary or moderate quality—neither very good nor very bad, and often slightly disappointing The quality is average but expectations of high quality are not met. He expected more but got what he asked for. We overuse top models because of this.
- lukan 3d agoThe claim was there is no difference between Opus and Fable but to me there is. Opus delivered mediocre results. Not garbage, but would have required me to do lot's of things myself. Fable did not needed my supervision with this task.