leppie

6 ms·

1.
by leppie 11y ago
Agreed. Odds probably the RAM was mismatched, and the BIOS did not choose conservative settings. Also could be voltage mismatch, and then your low voltage modules could fry (unlikely though).
2.
by leppie 11y ago
6. Tell the coworker to vent on Twitter. Works wonders for me. It is like shouting at /dev/null :)
3.
by leppie 11y ago
Let me guess, this has something to do with SUBST.
4.
by leppie 11y ago
Walk, if they want you back, charge them ludicrous consulting rates.
5.
by leppie 11y ago
Seems the same as Web Components/Polymer. Not sure why neither are mentioned...
6.
by leppie 12y ago
I am hoping to hack a bit on the runtime to add some missing features to IronScheme (read: proper continuations!).
7.
by leppie 12y ago
So bipolar then?
8.
by leppie 12y ago
Author misinterpreted specs... "Each packet has 20 bytes of useful payload and consumes 49 μA at 3 V" That is a manufacture average for some profile, mostly sleeping 99% of the time. The real consumption during broadcast is in the
9.
by leppie 14y ago
So in Java, a parameter named 'filename' is automatically aliased to 'path'? Doh... static String readFirstLine(String filename) { try { BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(path)); .... So people writes this e
10.
by leppie 14y ago
Magic in progress just takes infinite time when code contains Unicode... Or is it just me?
11.
by leppie 14y ago
Cute, but why does it not say I use Scheme???
12.
by leppie 14y ago
Heck, I only get 15. I would kill for 20.
13.
by leppie 14y ago
The category was: Proxy avoidance. Yes, Fortiguard is a POS, but some of us have no choice behind corporate firewalls/proxies.
14.
by leppie 14y ago
Who knows? Why does people downvote me for reporting the issue ?
15.
by leppie 14y ago
Blocked by Fortiguard, and reported. Edit: To clarify. It was blocked. I reported this 'false positive' to Fortiguard to remove it from their list. They normally clear it in 24 hours.
16.
by leppie 14y ago
There is something very wrong with the concept of 'runtime' macros. How is a 'runtime' macro any better than a function/procedure? TBH, I have no idea what a use case would be for a 'runtime' macro. A macro is generally a compile-time sourc
17.
by leppie 14y ago
If you want a quiet PC, just install a decent watercooling system. Watercooling does not necessarily mean overclocking. I just like a quiet PC :)
18.
by leppie 15y ago
IE seems to be the only browser not requesting the source again, which is what you would expect...
19.
by leppie 15y ago
I never take anyone serious when they say 'kernal'.
20.
by leppie 15y ago
Like the old saying goes: "I work for money. If you want loyalty, get a dog."
21.
by leppie 15y ago
So now we will be counting tabs instead of parenthesis. I still prefer the latter.
22.
by leppie 15y ago
Funny article. He mentions 'tail call elimination' once, and then never mentions 'tail call' again. Also a 'tail call' and 'tail call elimination' are 2 completely different things. The former being an implementation detail (to provide prop
23.
by leppie 15y ago
Terrible audio, wish I could bear it though. Really wanted to listen.
24.
by leppie 15y ago
http://ironscheme.codeplex.com
25.
by leppie 15y ago
I wonder how many bootloaders and recovery images (specifically the commercial ones) uses the Linux kernel for it?
26.
by leppie 15y ago
Most software products specifically prohibits using it in a nuclear environment.
27.
by leppie 15y ago
Hacker News is becoming more and more just News. What does this have to do with 'hacking'?
28.
by leppie 15y ago
Global report (excludes Africa). US is dirt cheap compared to internet pricing here...
29.
by leppie 15y ago
Forbidden You don't have permission to access /2011/06/18/genius-diesel-launches-excelbook/ on this server.
30.
by leppie 15y ago
Fixed now :)

More ›