leobuskin

5 ms·

1.
by leobuskin 8d ago
mmm, someone decided to reuse `zookeeper` name, seriously?
2.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
Heretic?
3.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
That’s the first model that fits CC as it’s own, zero issues, but probably ZCode or whatever z.ai’s cli is.
4.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
On $80 plan 200M tokens ~20% of weekly usage
5.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
It’s comparable to Anthropic usage, to be honest. 2x GLM agents ate 18% of weekly usage on this mid-tier plan within ~8 hrs (non-stop work, a lot of tool calls, appx 4 compactions each), I think. I didn’t make a proper statistics snapshot,
6.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
https://docs.z.ai/devpack/latest-model#switching-models-in-c...
7.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
In what scenarios?
8.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
I’ve tried a bunch of them, and I seriously do not understand these recommendations. It was a rough road and a steep hill, but right now CC is absolutely the best harness on the market, as for me, whatever top tier model is under the hood (
9.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
Fable wasn’t trained on github commits, let’s be fair.
10.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
Impossible with source code, possible to bypass with app/site
11.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
Exactly my CoT! I hope z.ai won’t change this behavior after training it on our input the same way as Anthropic did (shame on you, folks, seriously)
12.
by leobuskin 1mo ago
I bought $18 GLM official subscription yesterday (5.2, but new model version was already leaking on some docs), set it up with Claude Code harness... and I’ve bumped to $80 plan almost immediately. It’s the first model that agreed on a prop
13.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
Nope, they want shared artifact(s) between web and desktop (not sure what do they have in mobile apps) clients (Chat/Cowork/Code/CC-cli), so TS is the way to go. It’s a reasonable choice made by engineers.
14.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
Is it some Claude Team/Enterprise only problematic? I'm using two 20x Max accounts almost non-stop (Fable/Opus) for 1.5 years at this point, zero issues with both client and infra sides (from US and in travels). When I&#x27
15.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
If I understand correctly, time spent within this interstellar ship reference frame would be significantly less than 75k years. And at 1c speed, 48 years on Earth would be ~2 years of "flight" for the passengers, correct me if I&#
16.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
Is there a way to turn options-based AskUserQuestion off? I couldn't find it at all, and the "options" selector is the most annoying thing in CC for me, plain-text is the only way, everything else is distracting. I know, I ca
17.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
That's not a bailout for AI labs, I meant the "bailout" for Salesforce and others. There's absolutely no place for them in the world where we have Fable+ models. For many of them. Most of them (we just didn't get t
18.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
@anthropic, can you finally add $800-$1000 per month plan and allow us to work instead of tracking your weekly changes and dramas? I think, we (individuals, small-medium biz, first of all) did our best to help you train the model like Fable
19.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
Mojo folks created a new language, officially called it "superset", and trying to sell to enterprise. And it's not a superset by definition, because it can't run it's "subset" (the original Python) without
20.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
It uses JIT
21.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
It passes only curated corpus (snippets), not the full CPython test suite. So, yes, reading is hard. Nothing against AI, btw.
22.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
It's possible, but we're at the moment when most of us can ask Fable to implement a custom compiler to a custom target for our favorite language, and even use it as a part of custom solution. Why do I need someone else's impl
23.
by leobuskin 2mo ago
A few problems with this Fable's project: 1. It's not Python by any means, it's a subset with its own runtime, its own quirks and nuances; 2. It will be impossible to maintain parity with CPython without AI assistance; 3. It
24.
by leobuskin 3mo ago
“If you are already vibe-coded in Rust”, probably is better, Nub has a strong smell all the way (which is ok, just funny to compare with Bun). P.S. The entire Bun’s anti-AI hysteria makes me very sad, sometimes it feels like a directed camp
25.
by leobuskin 3mo ago
I’m using it a lot in AI-driven reverse-engineering (old DOS games), agents love it (usually Python harness)
26.
by leobuskin 3mo ago
It's a pretty big difference in quality, definitely no. I'll miss Fable a lot, it was the first time when the model was able to catch up with my abandoned compiler project, and it did it extremely well, I have seen nothing like th
27.
by leobuskin 4mo ago
I've used Claude to fix/reconstruct & build leaked Win2k3 on Linux with original toolchain via Wine. This approach included full gdi sources reconstruction. I just don't know what to do with this, it's kinda difficul
28.
by leobuskin 4mo ago
I apologize, may I ask you, do you use Bun? If yes, you probably do monitor the development of this project (I do, it sounds reasonable to track your tools/deps), probably familiar with Jared's coding style, decision making proces
29.
by leobuskin 4mo ago
I'm afraid "we" tackle (agressively) the wrong problem, also making it's tough for the maintainers, who did nothing wrong (I have a lot of sympathy towards Bun's developers, they got a lot of ugly feedback within th
30.
by leobuskin 4mo ago
absolutely, and `its development seems to have taken a turn towards being fully vibe-coded` ungrounded claim confirms the hysteria, I'm afraid

More ›