kyle_martin1

5 ms·

1.
by kyle_martin1 1y ago
This is political. Keep it off hacker news.
2.
by kyle_martin1 4y ago
Managed to make a massive cursor and it was broadcasted to the whole party. Had some fun hacking this with Chrome dev tools. Was simple as breakpointing in dev tools on "mousewheel", setting h.scale = 15, and then resuming. Massiv
3.
by kyle_martin1 4y ago
Agreed. The title should be neutralized to something like “Elon Musk offers to purchase Twitter for $43B”
4.
by kyle_martin1 4y ago
This is common in modern embedded devices. Sometimes they're called eFuses. https://imxdev.gitlab.io/tutorial/Burning_eFuses_on_i.MX/
5.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
I think he’s implying that the investment of time must be so large to do something like this that it couldn’t just be a hobby.
6.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
And hide the White House's like to dislike ratio. Check out some videos-- the ratio is horrible: https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteHouse/videos
7.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Sounds like they're taking "you're not allowed to disagree" from 1984 to heart.
8.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Please explain. All you said said was “I disagree”.
9.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Then use useful idiots (Twitter users) for your political advantage. Historical context: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.robesonian.com/opinion/1359...
10.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Here’s what the White House has to say: https://twitter.com/jasonrantz/status/1449144813291331588 Source article: Psaki Defends Rising Prices: ‘Good Thing’ Because It Means ‘More People Are Buying Goods’ https:
11.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
"Deplatforming" is just a roundabout way of saying "you're not welcome here because we don't agree with your speech". YouTube's criteria of what is and is not harmful is the issue.
12.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
That's like saying KGB officers are just following orders. They're complicit implementors.
13.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
YouTube makes opinionated decisions about what gets in their search results. They edit their search results and have a team that decides that goes on the front page. That's editing. YouTube is a publisher.
14.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Deciding what is right or wrong is the issue. YouTube isn’t transparent nor consistent about this. Social Media are publications due to their extreme efforts in curating content and speech topics. They need to be regulated as such.
15.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Silencing people and pretending it’s OK is not going to work. It’s a double edge sword. Because one day they’re going to silence you. The math doesn’t work out long term.
16.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Right. That's why folks are moving from Texas to California. Oh wait...
17.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Yeah I had this theory too and was recently introduced to the term. Turns out no idea is original. This site is pretty good: https://anacyclosis.org/portfolio/what-is-anacyclosis/ Conservatives believe the USA is
18.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Congratulations! You discovered a gem of history-- it repeats itself. Look up theory of Anacyclosis.
19.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
As a Texan, don't move here if you do not intend to adopt our culture. You have 49 other options after all.
20.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Why was this flagged? Oh the irony.
21.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
It has better cameras. Higher dynamic range which means it can handle tunnels, shade, etc. better. The cameras can also see further which means the possibility for traffic light behavior in the future.
22.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
I agree with you but...you're also not claiming you're project/product is open source.
23.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
I use my comma two everyday. Works great. Support from the company is non-existent. I'm kind of pissed because I bought it in the last few months and now they've come out with another one. There should be a trade-in and upgrade pr
24.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Not actually open source. The source code that’s available is a thin wrapper around a closed-source ML model. If George really cared about Open Source he would release the training architecture and training data.
25.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
You're saying Google is the same as a small family business? If that's the case then there's no reasonable discussion to be had here...
26.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
The very worst things in history were actually censored. Ever considered this? Your argument about "worst of humanity" could equally apply to the best of humanity with free speech. In fact...who are you to decide what is good spee
27.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
How do I know the site owner’s own biases? They’re defining their own spectrum which is inherently biased.
28.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
I don’t think there such a thing as objective journalism—- there is only who is honest about the lens from which they view the world. For instance, CNN is left leaning and Fox is right leaning. They should just explicitly state their viewpo
29.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Local news stations get their agenda for their parent companies. They are told what to cover, what not to cover, and how to cover things to fit the overarching narrative from executives/producers.
30.
by kyle_martin1 5y ago
Well, communism is heavily documented in history books.

More ›