kranuck

9 ms·

1.
by kranuck 2y ago
> Because that's what many AI experts are also talking about from a variety of angles. Wow, in that case I'm convinced. Such an unbiased group with nothing at all to gain from massive AI hype.
2.
by kranuck 2y ago
If you ignore the part where there proofs are meandering drivel, sure.
3.
by kranuck 2y ago
That's no guarantee that AI continues advancing at the same pace, and no one has been arguing against overall technological progress slowing Refining technology is easier than the original breakthrough, but it doesn't usually lead
4.
by kranuck 2y ago
It's gonna be massive because companies love to replace humans at any opportunity and they don't care at all about quality in a lot of places. For example, why hire any call center workers? They already outsourced the jobs to the
5.
by kranuck 2y ago
Really, cause I remember an endless stream of people pointing out problems with blockchain and crypto and being constantly assured that it was being worked on and would be solved and crypto is inevitable. For example, transaction costs&#x2F
6.
by kranuck 2y ago
> have no idea whether the LLM understood what I’m asking That's easy. The answer is it doesn't. It has no understanding of anything it does. > if it’s able to do it This is the hard part.
7.
by kranuck 2y ago
That problems feels somewhat fundamental to saying that these things have any ability to reason at all.
8.
by kranuck 2y ago
> For example, in the future we may wish to monitor the chain of thought for signs of manipulating the user I'm sick of these clowns couching everything in "look how amazing and powerful and dangerous out AI is" This is
9.
by kranuck 2y ago
> 11. This is all low-level pedantry Yeah pretty much. maybe don't write contradictory unexplained nonsense.
10.
by kranuck 2y ago
Yeah I stopped with 5 and 6 and will never give the slightest care what this person has to say ever again.