Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kljensen
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
kljensen
14y ago
I assume you're doing "work for hire", which implies that your copyright is assigned to the client in consideration for your wages. In your agreement, you could explicitly specifiy, absent payment in full, the copyright remains with you.
2.
▲
by
kljensen
15y ago
Here are all the patent cases in which Google was a plaintiff. They appear to all be declaratory judgments against NPE defendants. 4:2004-cv-04922 Google Inc. v. Skyline Software Systems Inc. 5:2005-md-01654 In re Compression Labs, Inc., P
3.
▲
Eric Schmidt's personal webpage
(ericschmidt.com)
1 points
by
kljensen
15y ago
|
1 comments
4.
▲
Patent Infringement Claims Against iOS Developers — Top 5 Things To Remember
(gametimeip.com)
1 points
by
kljensen
15y ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
kljensen
15y ago
Killer service, but two things jump out. 1) Need dkim signing by own domain and 2) envelope sender should match from address. These don't matter if you're sending to consumer domains (gmail, yahoo), but, as I've learned, they do matter fo
6.
▲
by
kljensen
15y ago
$9/mo fixed cost is a big step up from a pure pay-as-you-go. (But, also the cost of two cups of coffee at Starbucks, so still a bargain for the service provided.)
7.
▲
by
kljensen
15y ago
Totally right -- it's well within FB's TOS and you have no recourse other than to email them. But, humans responding to email doesn't scale well, hence the poor "customer service". (The quotes because, you're not so much the customer as th
8.
▲
Amazon sued over search auto-complete patent
(techcrunch.com)
2 points
by
kljensen
16y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Fair point. I feel like it's somewhat similar here. If djangy was [becoming] a success the team may have made a different decision.
10.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Quite respectable that they knew what they wanted and made the tough decision. Nothing wrong with striving greatly and failing, as long as you're in the arena. http://www.theodore-roosevelt.com/trsorbonnespeech.html
11.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Postmark is amazing, particularly the service from Natalie and Chris. Whenever I have an issue they respond within 20 minutes. It's unclear to me reading the SES docs how their spam handling will be; what they will be doing to police those
12.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Contingency counsel is usually only found on the plaintiff side. Twitter will use a big, reputable, and expensive defense firm.
13.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
It costs quite a bit, even to deal with trivial cases. Six figures at a minimum for show up at the courthouse, mostly in attorney's fees.
14.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Patents do not defend against "trolls" because "trolls" don't make products.
15.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Precisely, the article is FUD. There are many similar patents and the invention disclosed in this particular application is quite specific.
16.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Give them away to friends -- ideas are generally worthless, execution is everything. Be wary of your wife's laments, problems at home will sink your start up(s) very quickly.
17.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
They're open to lawsuits is any case -- such in the nature of selling products in the US. They likely have product liability insurance.
18.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Sometimes?
19.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Precisely. Isolated facts out of context make poor and usually misleading arguments.
20.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Isn't that a pretty big downside? Maybe I'm alone, but I use dropbox mostly for collaboration.
21.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Reaching business users is very difficult: they are generally older and not active on social networks with the exception of linked in. However, few people are "active" on LI except marketers and job seekers. I run a service in the corpora
22.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
This is super useful thanks. I'm mystified why puppet lacks substantive ec2 documentation on their website. I would have thought this was a major use case.
23.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
I'd like to see the sponsored research agreement. MIT specifies these things in all contacts. Not good for all parties involved because destroys much "value".
24.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Thanks, credit to my wife.
25.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
If the Rf duder is reading this, feel free to contact me. IANAL but I know thousands because I own the most popular patent litigation news service.
26.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
I can't wrap my head around what exactly this does. How is this related to mapreduce? Can anybody explain?
27.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Is it bad if the guy legitimately invented things, patented them, and they are infringed?
28.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Few, but you won't be sued unless you are making serious money in the first place.
29.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
No, Allen can file an amended complaint that satisfies the court.
30.
▲
by
kljensen
16y ago
Nice article. It could be improved if the author collected numerous, diverse lottery result articles and used these to create a script that outputs randomized articles. This is already done in the sports area, which is significantly more c
More ›