ken47

7 ms·

1.
by ken47 1mo ago
This wouldn't be a problem so long as they properly attribute.
2.
by ken47 3mo ago
Thanks for creating and sharing this.
3.
by ken47 3mo ago
Isn’t this related? Hundreds of UC faculty call to reinstate SAT, ACT requirements for STEM applicants: https://dailybruin.com/2026/05/27/hundreds-of-uc-faculty-cal...
4.
by ken47 4mo ago
> However, this was not verified in Lean. This is the caliber of thinking in unimpaired AI bullishness.
5.
by ken47 6mo ago
Because the majority of executives think AI is a magical black box, I’d reckon.
6.
by ken47 10mo ago
I have to wonder if there is a relation to the rising prevalence of coding LLMs.
7.
by ken47 1y ago
Coincidence is God’s way of remaining anonymous.
8.
by ken47 1y ago
And don't forget that physical loneliness, that is, actually being alone, eliminates one major feedback source that something could be wrong with your health, or a source of immediate aid if e.g. you go into cardiac arrest. Maybe the r
9.
by ken47 1y ago
The main premise of this article is that SPA frameworks are primarily about transitions. This is yet another passionate argument built on a false foundation.
10.
by ken47 1y ago
The overarching problem is that signal:noise ratio in contemporary discussions of AI is absurdly low. This is thanks in large part to a media complex whose primary goal seems to be the pumping of AI investments and stocks, and the associate
11.
by ken47 1y ago
Occam’s Razor applies.
12.
by ken47 1y ago
Those wealthy enough to invest or speculate in real estate incur a write-down they can likely afford - as Warren Buffett once said, don’t swim naked. The person of average or below-average means gets a chance at a standard life.
13.
by ken47 1y ago
We don't need AGI in order for AI to destroy humanity.
14.
by ken47 1y ago
> rise of IDEs, or Google search, or AWS. None of these things introduced the risk of directly breaking your codebase without very close oversight. If LLMs can surpass that hurdle, then we’ll all be having a different conversation.
15.
by ken47 1y ago
Longer.
16.
by ken47 1y ago
You can pre-agree on a solution path with human engineers too, with a similar effect.
17.
by ken47 1y ago
Search engineering forums online. If you haven’t found the walls, you haven’t been trying.
18.
by ken47 1y ago
Let’s not conflate LLM’s with AI. LLM’s are a kind of AI that can be a software engineer’s assistant, at best. But the degree of hype is undermining belief in AI among many professionals who the hypesters claim are going to be replaced. No,
19.
by ken47 1y ago
That’s weird. Why is the data from the unconnected databases of test companies in a single place?
20.
by ken47 1y ago
As expected, shallow analysis from people who don’t understand our craft and/or are all too happy to feed a hype train.
21.
by ken47 1y ago
Human experts set the benchmarks and LLM’s cannot match them in most (maybe any?) fields requiring sophisticated judgment. They are very useful for some things, but sophisticated judgment is not one of them.
22.
by ken47 1y ago
[flagged]
23.
by ken47 1y ago
Not really possible when success in South Korea is literally like the Squid Games and entrance exams are extremely difficult compared to what Westerners may be accustomed to. I agree the signal provided by this is low-dimensional, but it’s
24.
by ken47 1y ago
Written by software != written by AI. But CNBC has to pump.
25.
by ken47 1y ago
The hype levels are so overwhelming that AI coding could never hope to meet them. I've tried having a highly-ranked AI coding app write unit tests for a relatively complex codebase. 80% of the generated test cases failed. But an expe
26.
by ken47 1y ago
Behind the apparent waffling, the one constant is the administration’s effort to direct hatred towards China. You have American military leaders predicting an invasion of Taiwan in a specific time window. It’s all a circus.
27.
by ken47 2y ago
Is the limiting factor preventing all websites from being written in assembly also the intelligence of the developer base? What an obtuse take.
28.
by ken47 2y ago
This post is about a soundbar, not a smart TV.
29.
by ken47 2y ago
That is in the hands of the ultra-wealthy class. What is the goal of enabling people to cross these thresholds? Who does it benefit?
30.
by ken47 2y ago
Not saying that the ultra-wealthy have the right to be tyrants, but "peasants" of today's age have a quality of life that is orders of magnitudes better than peasants in the feudal age. This simple truth seems to get lost so

More ›