jsprogrammer

6 ms·

31.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Anyone know what "brains" are being run on YouTube?
32.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
There is harm from the association, if the association is not accurate.
33.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
>They don't seem to be involved in any other way but "NASA Eagleworks Laboratories" makes it sound like official NASA organization. If the NASA name is being used unofficially in such a public manner, wouldn't NASA do
34.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Not a proof.
35.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Cards should be easy to pull. Things are tightening up.
36.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I doubt WikiLeaks wants them. Know how to make a Gmail account public? Maybe I could crowd source people to clean up all the spam?
37.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
DNC could have gone open source at anytime. They choose not to.
38.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Just as I was sending something to Katie Couric, too.
39.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Clearly, knowing the "local" time of your friend's wakening is critical.
40.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
>"X said Y but there is no evidence for this" That is not a known falsehood. It is just speculation.
41.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Sarcasm is an excellent genre for short texts.
42.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
The end of the article states that everything it discussed prior is only part of a "toy". It is known that the toy being studied does not fully correspond to our universe.
43.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
If the sources were reliable, it wouldn't be slander.
44.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Also a strong case for large punitive damages. Lyft puts out a carrot and then fucks you for profit? No jury will put up with that (neither will Lyft's settlement team).
45.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
It doesn't matter when the company contradicts their fine print. Seriously, did you look at the screenshots?
46.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Known falsehoods are facts that should be reported.
47.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Doesn't "If they want it you should build it" already assume "if you build it they will come"? If you don't think they will come, why are you doing it?
48.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
"We are expressing to Justice, our view, that no charges are appropriate in this case." - Comey
49.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Those points should be given airtime as they are destroyed in public and the responsible parties brought to justice. Censorship is never the answer.
50.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I think what it means is that (C) data was removed from a documented and transmitted.
51.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
The first comment linked to it[0]? [0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597800
52.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I don't think you watched Comey's presentation. He said that Clinton should not be prosecuted (ie. no conviction).
53.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
NNs/ANNs/DNNs/xNNs have already[0] been framed as easily fooled. [0] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.1897.pdf
54.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Yes. The how and why in this case are pretty much the same thing however. Why does a program do what it does? Because a physical machine is running a distinct code.
55.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
According to the article, anyone can negotiate for a raise at any time. All you have to do is execute the negotiation process.
56.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Or a 20 hour work-week with full salary.
57.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Yes, I thought the meaning of obsessed was clear. The poster was referring to people who are preoccupied with (presumably, `others'`) community contract negotiations.
58.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
What is so strange about it? If a theory is not and cannot be tested, it is not science by definition. That doesn't mean the theory is not valuable, just that you need a different word to describe it. If a theory may become testable in
59.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Not necessarily. Java byte code can be run directly on a JPM (Java Physical Machine).
60.
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
Reddit has multiple payment bots. See: https://www.reddit.com/r/changetip/ I believe there are Twitter bots for the same. Any bot should be generalizable to any text medium.

More ›