joeldrapper

7 ms·

1.
by joeldrapper 6mo ago
They’re in age order and age 15 starts at about a quarter of the way down. Shame on the flaggers.
2.
by joeldrapper 6mo ago
That’s what it looks like to me, but I haven’t yet seen a good explanation of their motive. Why would the development of `rv` be such a threat to them? I know specific individuals hate Andre and have had beef with him for years, but it’s ha
3.
by joeldrapper 6mo ago
sad but true
4.
by joeldrapper 6mo ago
Some estimates are about two million but I think that’s an extremely loose definition of Ruby Developer. I run rubyschema.org which maintains the rubocop JSON schema that’s pulled via schema store. I can see there are about 21k unique downl
5.
by joeldrapper 6mo ago
> Ruby Central’s actions during this period were taken in response to a breakdown in a working relationship with an individual who had significant access to infrastructure and code. This is the first time they’ve actually admitted that t
6.
by joeldrapper 10mo ago
It can be a mistake though to assume that the DOM hasn’t changed since it was rendered. Browser extensions, ad blockers and other JavaScript can modify the DOM. I know it’s more expensive, but it’s like 1ms to render a document on the serve
7.
by joeldrapper 10mo ago
I don’t hate SPAs, I just think some apps are better off being MPAs. I wouldn’t build a todo list app as an MPA. But many apps really are just CRUD forms and tables.
8.
by joeldrapper 10mo ago
Thank you so much. Please ping me if you have any questions about these techniques. I’m `joeldrapper` on Discord and GitHub.
9.
by joeldrapper 10mo ago
I enjoy writing mostly SSR apps with just a few specific Svelte components mounted as custom elements. It works really well.
10.
by joeldrapper 10mo ago
My specific use case was building a form where each change to an input would fetch a new copy of the form from the server and morph it in place. It means the server-side code can be really simple. You can make parts of the form depend on th
11.
I made a better DOM morphing algorithm(joel.drapper.me)
96 points by joeldrapper 10mo ago|56 comments
12.
by joeldrapper 11mo ago
Incredibly mature response, turning the other cheek.
13.
by joeldrapper 11mo ago
I’m not talking about who wrote the code. Hundreds of people wrote the code, that’s not particularly relevant. I’m talking about who had maintainership of the code and how those maintainers had agreed to govern the project. What was your ma
14.
by joeldrapper 11mo ago
I believe the quote pulled from my article is true. Freedom’s original article lines up with what other people told me. I know he’s tried to retract it, but I don’t trust him to be truthful in this matter. He has lied about other things l
15.
by joeldrapper 11mo ago
Ruby Central is making legal threats to its critics, so I hope you can see why people don’t feel safe to come forward on the record. I can tell you that two people with direct knowledge of the situation told me that Shopify demanded that Ru
16.
by joeldrapper 11mo ago
So it’s okay for Matz to get HSBT to steal people’s open source projects? What if Matz sponsors stole Ruby from him? WTF?
17.
by joeldrapper 11mo ago
These projects were not Ruby Central’s in the first place. They were stolen for Ruby Central by a Ruby Core insider, HSBT. This is horrible news. They were stolen from André Arko, Colby Swandale, David Rodríguez, Ellen, Josef Šimánek, Marti
18.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
I believe the CDN is provided for free by Fastly. Not sure about other funding at the moment.
19.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
How does `.coop` get used for spam when you need to prove you’re an actual cooperative to get one?
20.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
Yes, I will be one of those people.
21.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
Only “minor” because they were in fact wrong about André being a risk. Had he been a real risk, this would have been about as major as it gets. They left him with root production AWS console and full production database access. Fortunately
22.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
I expect a lot of people will stop pushing gem updates to `rubygems.org` once `gem.coop` supports publishing directly to namespaces.
23.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
I believe the hosting is already covered.
24.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
Why has this been flagged?
25.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
I heard it directly from people directly involved.
26.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
I also fact checked that video here. https://joel.drapper.me/p/ruby-central-fact-check/
27.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
HSBT was a maintainer who had "owner" permissions on GitHub.
28.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
I don’t think you read the post. Ruby Central has never owned the source code. They operated a service that had the same name.
29.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
I said in the post that HSBT who was a maintainer invited Marty as an owner of the GitHub account. This was against the wishes of the other maintainers who had established practices for adding new maintainers.
30.
by joeldrapper 1y ago
With no updates to their status page or social media accounts, it’s possible they don’t know.

More ›