9 ms·
So it’s okay for Matz to get HSBT to steal people’s open source projects? What if Matz sponsors stole Ruby from him? WTF?
by joeldrapper 11mo ago
So it’s okay for Matz to get HSBT to steal people’s open source projects? What if Matz sponsors stole Ruby from him? WTF?
- rich_kilmer 11mo agoI was one of the originating authors of RubyGems along with Jim (RIP), Chad, David and Paul. I hosted RubyGems from my home for the entire community for many years. We never asked nor received anything for that. We wrote RubyGems for the Ruby community. Matz and the Ruby Core team is the right place for RubyGems. This is great news.
- sebiw 11mo agoThanks for sharing. RIP Jim, I miss him being part of the community.
- the_mitsuhiko 11mo ago> So it’s okay for Matz to get HSBT to steal people’s open source projects? Where is the theft? The projects were open source, they are still open source.
- bmacho 11mo agoThe software is open source, not the project. The name is not for the taking. You can download the code, modify and release it, but you can't just claim ownership over a product.
- baggy_trough 11mo agoAndre Arko was not the original author, so how did he get the name? Did he take it from someone?
- bmacho 11mo agoI don't know, and I don't care. I wonder if you try to imply something ridiculously strong, general, and obviously false here?
- the_mitsuhiko 11mo agoThat is a question of trademark law and a much more complex topic. Many people contributed over the years.
- mijoharas 11mo agoHave we got any sources for Matz getting HSBT to steal it? I mean, I get that they're both members of ruby core, but that's a bit of a claim.