jfyi

5 ms·

1.
by jfyi 29d ago
We are getting the "intrusive nanny state" regardless of financial incentives of a given healthcare system. That ship has sailed. It's a goal, not a side effect.
2.
by jfyi 1mo ago
Jason Wei's chain-of-thought prompting techniques literally revolutionized llms themselves. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903
3.
by jfyi 1mo ago
Johnny Long is the godfather of google dorking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo1BR9itwOY https://blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-05/bh-us-05-long.p... https://en.wikipedia.org&#x2F
4.
by jfyi 1mo ago
I don't think soft skills describes it in the traditional sense. The skillset largely needed with LLMs is more akin to being an editor or qa tester. I suppose you could describe having the modesty to admit to yourself when you don&#x27
5.
by jfyi 1mo ago
I disagree, both of those are skills. Neither are skills that a large portion of users of those services pursue to any meaningful extent, I'll grant you that. They also certainly are not synonymous with the term "soft skills"
6.
by jfyi 1mo ago
Why do you assume the cert would be tied to the camera?
7.
by jfyi 1mo ago
Anyone that has seen someone take a strong dose of datura can attest that what you are saying is all correct. It is not a traditional psychedelic in any way, shape, or form. It's wild seeing someone fully interact with a reality that i
8.
by jfyi 1mo ago
How do you think it's an issue with what I've explained already? You are just repeating yourself now. Let's see if you can even explain what I am telling you. What would be the first step to resolve this issue in the system I
9.
by jfyi 1mo ago
And that's problematic if the certificate is also stolen at the same time, but that's why there is an authority to validate issues and address what needs to be done to resolve them. Next one please.
10.
by jfyi 1mo ago
Then the cert is pulled with a date and the timestamps on the images can be used to verify when they happened. This is generally how you'd handle theft. You can then also resign with a new cert at a later date. Besides, after a famous
11.
by jfyi 1mo ago
I have already said, it's done by establishing trust by tying identity to images. Your assertions aren't a counter to that. You thinking they are shows a lack of understanding of how to verify truth on a fundamental level. Let&#x2
12.
by jfyi 1mo ago
Yes, "the public" includes experts in the subject field and independent witnesses to events. If your argument is that images can't be verified, you are going to need to provide some kind of backing to that. We know well that
13.
by jfyi 1mo ago
Same way it works for tls and code signing. Public reports bad actors to the signing authority. They and/or independent firms investigate. You self report theft. It's not like we are inventing pki from scratch here and wondering w
14.
by jfyi 1mo ago
A camera should not need to be hacked. What do you expect to accomplish by hacking the camera? We should be able to move certificates on and off it because they would most likely expire anyway. So, you can get the keys from the camera, what
15.
by jfyi 1mo ago
The premise is not that it couldn't be faked. It would be more practical to remove the key from the hardware and just use it to sign images if you wanted to do that. The idea is that a centralized source of trust would revoke certifica
16.
by jfyi 1mo ago
With photos, I could see a cryptographic solution. Of course it would still need some kind of centralized trust, but it's doable if people cared enough. It could be applied by cameras themselves.
17.
by jfyi 1mo ago
The foundational failing I see in my countrymen is the notion that China can't innovate. Their economic reliance on exports is not untrue. Just like their reliance on energy imports is a fact (though one that we are seeing right now be
18.
by jfyi 1mo ago
What exactly was my example? You agreed with me already. Kind of odd to flip around now. > which are like you said handled Also, I corrected your misstatement about payments. They have absolutely nothing to do with decomp, and certainly
19.
by jfyi 1mo ago
You were the one that brought up payments though. Nobody else specified. They just said it could be hacked, which you seem to agree with.
20.
by jfyi 1mo ago
So your professional opinion is that the attack surface of mobile banking apps is limited to tokenized payments? Honestly, I'd be appalled if tokens were routed through my banking app. There is no reason the local client needs that dat
21.
by jfyi 1mo ago
It's pretty safe to say that most people don't know what cloudflare does, if they even know that it exists.
22.
by jfyi 1mo ago
It's ok, someone else can maintain it.
23.
by jfyi 2mo ago
Yeah, this is the point. I don't understand the bulk of this conversation. Copyright doesn't matter, the books themselves don't matter. All that matters is that their corpus of training data grows faster than their competitor
24.
by jfyi 2mo ago
No, I am trying to clarify your position and have already given mine. If you were actually unclear, how did you expect a rebuttal to be taken seriously? Pick one, concede the other and we can go from there. So, I'll ask directly. Are y
25.
by jfyi 2mo ago
I'm curious about this. Can you explain your viewpoint without asking questions? Also, do you identify as a "Libertarian" or "paleo-libertarian"? I really think the difference should be more evident in conversations
26.
by jfyi 2mo ago
We're talking early boom? Like WW2 era? It was more industrial. If we are defining tech worker as a person that worked at a factory for technology, I am pretty sure there is a history of immigration there too. I don't think we cou
27.
by jfyi 2mo ago
I'm not sure you can use state violence as a counter to a complaint about state violence. If your point is that we don't have easy solutions, yes I agree. I'd also point out that the distinction I am making is state vs person
28.
by jfyi 2mo ago
I am opposed to borders on a fundamental, ideological level. They are an expression of state violence prohibiting natural freedom of movement and trade. I don't believe that is actually a commonly held capital "L" Libertarian
29.
by jfyi 2mo ago
IDOR is a well known security issue that can result in exactly the scenario described (someone incrementing a counter in a url) and has on many occasions in different jurisdictions caused legal issues for the person doing it. Unless you are
30.
by jfyi 2mo ago
> the main crowd are wannabe master manipulators. also, they can often be distilled to a couple chapters, not sure why they're so long. Yes! Very similar to my own criticisms. It's thinly veiled authoritarianism. Nobody handing

More ›