Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
inetknght
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
inetknght
13d ago
Oh yeah, auth itself isn't that difficult. But... auth resilient against malicious actors?
2.
▲
by
inetknght
27d ago
> Consider this: if Microsoft exfiltrates your keystrokes, it's a privacy violation, but if a random person does the same thing then it's a security violation No, it's a security violation no matter who does it.
3.
▲
by
inetknght
2mo ago
[flagged]
4.
▲
by
inetknght
2mo ago
Yeah no. If I wanted to use a pager, I'd use a pager. I want the output visible on screen after I exit the pager. If I didn't want it on screen, I'd pipe it to a file and open that in a text editor. That will disappear when I
5.
▲
by
inetknght
2mo ago
Previous discussions: - (2024): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39273932 - (2020): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25304257
6.
▲
by
inetknght
2mo ago
So you're doing work but not willing to pay others to do?
7.
▲
by
inetknght
2mo ago
That's a great excuse. Meanwhile, there are billionaires whose investment incomes could pay those salaries many times over. Where do those investment incomes come from? Ahh, yes. Profits.
8.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
Transparency doesn't matter without consequences. Many of the currently ruling governments have demonstrated that already.
9.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
> It’s perfectly legitimate to say we’ll develop this in other markets and ship it to the EU when it’s fully baked. It's also perfectly legitimate to legally require business to slow the fuck down and consider how the thing will b
10.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
Interoperability only requires Apple to allow third parties to have the same capabilities that Apple does on your device . It doesn't require you to purchase or use a third party service or device. It merely allows you to have that ch
11.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
Microsoft was mostly on the Embrace step. They've reached the Extend step with Copilot. They'll eventually Extinguish grep. It's best not to use Microsoft products.
12.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
> Functionally the EU is requiring that Apple dramatically RELAX their privacy and security postures. No. Interoperability doesn't require Apple relax their privacy and security postures. It could instead require third parties to
13.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
Do you think this is a problem with the EU? I don't. I think it's a problem in the way that Big Tech operates: by function of theft and laundering of data, and by screwing end-users and consumers in favor of profits.
14.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
> Apple have a pretty large vested interest in not supporting interoperability here Yeah that needs to stop. This is kinda why the DMA was created in the first place...
15.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
> Skipping the EU makes sense in a fast-moving market (if you’re designated as a gatekeeper). Skipping the EU makes sense if the company doesn't want to comply with regulations aimed directly at it. > complying with the DMA fr
16.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
So Apple doesn't want to compete? Cry me a river. I could almost feel sympathy if it were something to do with some contract that Apple signed with their AI provider. Who's that, Google? Ahh, a "competitor"? Yeah... cr
17.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
My first "oh shit" moment was when ChatGPT 3 was brand new. Maybe December 2022 or so. I have a personal project: who's winning the race at 3 AM? You see, I don't sleep well. I live in a busy city, with a busy freeway ab
18.
▲
by
inetknght
3mo ago
I saw this show up in RSS feed on Slack before here. Interesting, posted a message about it. Not 2 minutes later, a coworker sent a message saying they got a message: their repository messages couldn't be sent, because the user is no l
19.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
> Why save all the blame for the side that actually put up resistance Resistance is one definition, I guess. A very loose definition. I'd call it what it was. Career sociopaths decided to put a career sociopath on the ballot inste
20.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
I completely agree with you. Unfortunately, most of the world seems to disagree with us.
21.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
> Nobody forced them to use their real names and post countless pictures of their faces alongside No? You've obviously never been ostracized from your friends, family, or coworkers due to not using Facebook or Instagram or whateve
22.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
> 10 years? Damn, that is a long time. I always assumed that heat-induced damage will kill a CPU after a certain amount of time (5-7 years). Am I wrong here? I assume yes. Or are CPUs must stronger/tougher than the bad old days? M
23.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
It's certainly relevant to the topic: notifications, and a claim of legal requirements. Legal requirements are useless without enforcement.
24.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
Really? You might want to ask most contractors, or contract lawyers, about that. "I was just following orders" for basic property damage typically doesn't hold up in court for them either.
25.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
> I always thought robots being used for evil would be cool dystopian dictatorships that would try to grind me under its boot but I would resist. Instead it’s just It's... both.
26.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
Scope Violation: `cat ~/.zshrc` Scope Violation: `ls ~/Documents` Buddy, my `${HOME}` is committed to a repository. It includes `.bashrc` and `Documents` directory. These are not scope violations if I'm having the LLM work on
27.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
> I’ve almost never encountered a marketing email that didn’t have an unsubscribe link Have you encountered a "marketing email" that you didn't sign up for? That's called phishing. Have you clicked on links in phish
28.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
> It needs to be enforced by the OS or by law. Like how you get transactional emails without getting marketing spam. What glorious universe do you live in where email is respected enough to have transactions separate from marketing, an
29.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
> they were smart enough to meter it greedy* enough, sure
30.
▲
by
inetknght
4mo ago
Okay, now same question except one small change. There's only one company: the one with the backlog. The other company either went bankrupt or was bought out and consolidated into the first company.
More ›