8 ms·

[flagged]

overfeed 2mo ago
> That's just a way to offload problems to other projects. Don't do that That depends on what the other project is: OpenClaw would be perfect, as it welcomes automated contributions
- jjmarr 2mo ago
  In this case, it'd be Clang, which does allow AI use.
  - PalmPilotProMax 2mo ago
    Nominative determinism and cosmic irony in action. Who'd thought the Fall of Clang would be caused by Clangers Slop.
    - rswail 2mo ago
      I thought they were "clankers" not "clangers"?
      - PalmPilotProMax 2mo ago
        In a sense, Clankers are a clanger.
antonvs 2mo ago
> That's just a way to offload problems to other projects. The 21st century version of signing someone up for spam email.
ffsm8 2mo ago
I think the alternative project is a great idea, it should be a Honeypot essentially. Something that nobody maintains or looks at, maybe just accepting all contributions no matter how retarded. Now you've successfully mitigated them As an extra aside you can add a contributors guidelines there that contributions explicitly accepts the privacy notice, and then write in it that you will continuously subscribe all authors to all spam lists you can find and will publish SEO optimizees articles about them how they're a danger for employment etc
- nananana9 2mo ago
  There's plenty of people having the time of their lifes generating biblical amounts of slop that would be welcoming of a few million SLOC, I meant to forward the traffic there. I don't care what consenting LLMs do in the privacy of their own codebases, I'd just rather not see it in mine. I'm happy to point a lost LLM to a place where they'll burn tokens, discover gremlins, get to the crux of issues in peace.
LtWorf 2mo ago
What if I point to a VC owned project that is already full on AI?
- tempodox 2mo ago
  Wouldn’t that potentially violate the Prime Directive? You could accidentally create AGI by exceeding the critical mass of slop.
lrvick 2mo ago
Well, they should point users to a project responsible enough to accept huuman reviewed security and bug fixes that happen to have been written by an llm.
inigyou 2mo ago
This comment is flagged and I went to vouch it, but I can't vouch but I can reply. What gives?

[flagged]

> That's just a way to offload problems to other projects. Don't do that That depends on what the other project is: OpenClaw would be perfect, as it welcomes automated contributions

jjmarr 2mo ago
In this case, it'd be Clang, which does allow AI use.
- PalmPilotProMax 2mo ago
  Nominative determinism and cosmic irony in action. Who'd thought the Fall of Clang would be caused by Clangers Slop.
  - rswail 2mo ago
    I thought they were "clankers" not "clangers"?
    - PalmPilotProMax 2mo ago
      In a sense, Clankers are a clanger.

antonvs 2mo ago

> That's just a way to offload problems to other projects. The 21st century version of signing someone up for spam email.

ffsm8 2mo ago

I think the alternative project is a great idea, it should be a Honeypot essentially. Something that nobody maintains or looks at, maybe just accepting all contributions no matter how retarded. Now you've successfully mitigated them As an extra aside you can add a contributors guidelines there that contributions explicitly accepts the privacy notice, and then write in it that you will continuously subscribe all authors to all spam lists you can find and will publish SEO optimizees articles about them how they're a danger for employment etc

nananana9 2mo ago
There's plenty of people having the time of their lifes generating biblical amounts of slop that would be welcoming of a few million SLOC, I meant to forward the traffic there. I don't care what consenting LLMs do in the privacy of their own codebases, I'd just rather not see it in mine. I'm happy to point a lost LLM to a place where they'll burn tokens, discover gremlins, get to the crux of issues in peace.

LtWorf 2mo ago

What if I point to a VC owned project that is already full on AI?

tempodox 2mo ago
Wouldn’t that potentially violate the Prime Directive? You could accidentally create AGI by exceeding the critical mass of slop.

lrvick 2mo ago

Well, they should point users to a project responsible enough to accept huuman reviewed security and bug fixes that happen to have been written by an llm.

inigyou 2mo ago

This comment is flagged and I went to vouch it, but I can't vouch but I can reply. What gives?