indefatigable

5 ms·

1.
by indefatigable 13y ago
I'm not sure absolute falsification is meaningful with this kind of prediction. Then it's not science.
2.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Yep, great movie.
3.
by indefatigable 13y ago
OK that's good to hear. But read about the history of eugenics if you'd like to know how other people might misinterpret your argument.
4.
by indefatigable 13y ago
What situation would falsify the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming? Or the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic ocean acidification?
5.
by indefatigable 13y ago
When someone says they have the right to dictate not only how much energy I use, but also where that energy comes from, I call it fascism.
6.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Yeah yeah, I read Ishmael too.
7.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Stewardship means handing it over to fascists?
8.
by indefatigable 13y ago
That's it, thanks!
9.
by indefatigable 13y ago
We seem to disagree, as I'm convinced that a carbon tax would almost certainly be an unmitigated disaster.
10.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Most scientists agreed that fire involved phlogiston not so very long ago.
11.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Giving politicians the authority to levy a carbon tax is an absolutely terrible idea, and it has nothing to do with how I feel about China.
12.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Someone laments the fact that we're all doomed and wants to upend the social order, then someone else replies with a casual implication that population control would be an effective remedy. What a surprise.
13.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Actually it seems like that's not the correct attribution. It was probably Peter Marshall: "Give to us clear vision that we may know where to stand and what to stand for—because unless we stand for something, we shall fall for any
14.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Someone famous once said something to the effect of: "When people believe in nothing, they will believe anything." Interestingly enough most of those people are completely in denial about their own irrational zealotry.
15.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Since regulating CO2 is such a useful political tool, it's not surprising that a new hypothesis justifying regulation has been making its way into the mainstream as the global warming movement collapses. I doubt that the researchers in
16.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Ah well, everybody has their off days.
17.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Yet Germany has institutionalized the same mentality on a more abstract level. "Global warming might be happening, shut down the energy industry!" "We can't use nuclear power, someone might get cancer ! Keep mining coal
18.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Wot wot pip pip cheerio get the torch line's engaged eat some crisps there's a good chap.
19.
by indefatigable 13y ago
In other words, we should trust the DHHS and the IRS with information that the NSA can't be trusted to access? Am I reading that correctly?
20.
by indefatigable 13y ago
Your opinions are provided by PageRank? Good to know.
21.
by indefatigable 13y ago
I'm getting a serious Poe's law vibe from this comment and username.