heimatau

7 ms·

1.
by heimatau 6y ago
> Honestly, the whole thing reads like a hit piece. To me it reads like cognitive dissonance. They write multiple damning statements (yes based in science) but conclude with 'voluntary changes' and 'more research'. I&
2.
by heimatau 6y ago
We're getting closer to writing out the Akashic records. Interesting recursion of our present moments that it becomes observable.
3.
by heimatau 6y ago
61.7M. It's a shame that the opportunity costs aren't included, fairly unjust.
4.
by heimatau 6y ago
That wasn't my comment...Also, it's refreshing that you can project my emotion on me (did I say embarrassed? did I say it was unpleasant? did I say I felt it was a Voltairean epigram?). Even though I stated you were incorrect on m
5.
by heimatau 6y ago
> I think by this point, with your help, I've arrived at the conclusion you were simply embarrassed by what you wrote, thanks. How so? I wasn't embarrassed. I was shocked at the immature reactions.
6.
by heimatau 6y ago
> That's not what I asked, but maybe I can try to rephrase it. It seems odd to be going to such verbose lengths to defend something you wrote but apparently don't want other people to see. I appreciate the attempt at clarity bu
7.
by heimatau 6y ago
> why did you delete it? I'll rephrase your question. What is the reason for the deletion of your comment? Simple. People were flaming. It was getting downvoted and flagged. If the community sends a clear statement (by acting in con
8.
by heimatau 6y ago
> but what you posted was unsubstantive flamebait Pointing out that the morals of Google diverging from their founding motto is absolutely substantive. As for flamebait, to someone whom has an axe to grind, everything is flamebait. Which
9.
by heimatau 6y ago
It wasn't a predictable flamewar. Maybe for you but it wasn't for me nor could you cite any observable evidence for my contribution in this. The other commenter was trying to flame, now that others seemingly piled on by needlessly
10.
by heimatau 6y ago
deleted
11.
by heimatau 6y ago
> , and mindfulness. Me too! I've been identifying more with my Quaker belief system and meditating more. I'm trying to be more consistent with it but man, it's opened up a whole new world. Keep up the great work! :)
12.
by heimatau 6y ago
> so I think the meaning here is not as strong Your post in interesting. I agree yet disagree. You got the context correct but he explicitly said 'it's the standard now for 32 bit general purpose instruction sets and it's
13.
by heimatau 6y ago
First, I really appreciate that you're opening up about your life. It's not easy to do, even with strangers on the web. > It's either, take that pill and turn into a robot, or... Might I suggest you think of it this way: T
14.
by heimatau 6y ago
It's great that you're also going to therapy. I hope the therapy is for the habits of ADD (if it's for other things, I suggest you include any ADD habit that's impeding your life). I waited until 25 yrs old. Took a break
15.
by heimatau 6y ago
So, here is one problem I have. One person says, 'Look they're corrupt, they're taking money from someone they need to regulate'. Then...when someone from their identity politics does it, it's 'no big deal&#x27
16.
by heimatau 6y ago
IMHO, the truth of a 10x tradesman/tradeswoman is very real. I point to the pareto distribution to reaffirm it. I've seen some workers that fly through tasks (construction tasks, programming, managerial, etc) and they hold the win
17.
by heimatau 6y ago
> The economy is truly crippled! Great, I love the sarcasm! Can you please help push RH and other brokers to allow the unbridled buying of the current stocks being restricted? Then we can really put the theories to the test.
18.
by heimatau 6y ago
> it's crushing a few hedge funds that happened to hold short positions in a few stocks You haven't noticed that the big three indexes are DOWN ~2% today? They were down 2% when this first took off. [If you want to split hairs.
19.
by heimatau 6y ago
I find this refreshing actually. What reason? Because it demystifies the room. It pulls the veil off and we get to see behind the curtain. Strangely enough, I had a fleeting thought that this is why few firms went under and most got bailed
20.
by heimatau 6y ago
It doesn't work with all videos and it's what I currently use. I might be having some conflicting plugins but I like the setup/attempt.
21.
by heimatau 6y ago
>> (me) I encourage you, prove your case that EU provides this human right. > (you: prof-dr-ir) This is a basic tenet of law: it is not forbidden, hence you are free to use encryption everywhere in the EU. QED :) Interesting. You w
22.
by heimatau 6y ago
> Have you proved the point that I need to "assume malice"? Catch up to the conversation. I moved on from my characterization to repeat my question without the malice. You said 'i can answer your question', yet your e
23.
by heimatau 6y ago
I appreciate your citations. What court cases prove your interpretation of the law? That's the rub.
24.
by heimatau 6y ago
> Can you provide me with examples of EU law that you consider abuses of power and that remove human rights? Their previous attempts to making encryption illegal. I believe encryption is a fundamental human right. You never answered my q
25.
by heimatau 6y ago
> No, you specifically said it's a first amendment problem and to let adults gamble. If it was a first amendment problem, gambling wouldn't be illegal in most states. Maybe you need explicit help to understand my position. If h
26.
by heimatau 6y ago
> Gambling isn't even legal in most states. Good luck arguing that. What States are you not allowed to short or long? Using your logic, this is cognitive dissonance. How free people spend their money is an act of speech, PACs and Su
27.
by heimatau 6y ago
Rumor mill says that the White House and Sequoia called RH to force their hand. Honestly, I wouldn't expect anything less. I say this because 2% drawdown of the stock market didn't happen for zero reason. It happened because these
28.
by heimatau 6y ago
>I have a hard time seeing it because, well, the resolution does in fact not explicitly ban (E2E) encryption. If you need the actions of the government to be explicit then you'd have a difficult time to prove any case. Let's tu
29.
by heimatau 6y ago
> I really hope that gambling on GME is not a "major part" of a significant number of people's lives. It's a major part of the mega wealthy's lives. They've profited in this pandemic and it's not becaus
30.
by heimatau 6y ago
I'm no fan of Youtube but...not being able to increase the playback speed is highly sought after when I watch videos on any sites (like the OP on att.com). Here is YT's version of the same video [1]. Edit: I removed the link becau

More ›