hatboat

4 ms·

1.
by hatboat 2y ago
If they're already an "enthusiast, grad student, hacker", are they likely to choose the "plumbers and people that know how to build houses" career track? True passion for one's career is rare, despite the clich
2.
by hatboat 2y ago
As an Australian, "youse" is the most common variation here. It's sometimes maligned as a bit lower-class/bogan, but it certainly fills a niche!
3.
by hatboat 3y ago
"Sorry, I didn't pick the game - it is what it is" said LeBron to Neymar as they lined up for some one-on-one.
4.
by hatboat 6y ago
I'm not implying this was your original intention, however without providing any commentary other than the Wikipedia quote your reply read to me like a "rebuttal" or counterargument to the OP. Furthermore, it comes across lik
5.
by hatboat 6y ago
I think this is a good point, however over time I believe less and less of option (2) will be used. Option (1) will become ubiquitous, and it is important it is done well. The researchers signing the letter should be exactly the ones helpin
6.
by hatboat 6y ago
This is one potential outcome. Another is organisations will keep the same content (as this is what drives clicks and profitability), however change the language used to describe it. I would say this outcome is worse, as it leads to things
7.
by hatboat 6y ago
The title is far from "clear" or "accurate". Attention-getting for sure. I had no idea what the premise of the article would be without clicking on it. The article's thesis: "abolish cop shit in the classroom&q
8.
by hatboat 6y ago
I think your second paragraph is misplaced. It's my belief that people "accepted a drastic and sudden lifestyle change over the last few months" precisely because it was advertised as a temporary measure. We're already s
9.
by hatboat 6y ago
I think an important point the author is trying to make is that we don't know how this is going to play out, with "scenario planning" being a central theme of the article. We have only experienced a few of the pandemic&#x27
10.
by hatboat 6y ago
Perhaps you didn't mean it in a literal sense, however you and I have a very different opinion on the term realistic. I believe a deus ex machina type carbon capture solution is a far more likely scenario than getting industrialised na
11.
by hatboat 6y ago
I like your idea of malfeasance insurance. Premiums could be priced in such a way that it takes into account your personal record, to incentivise your own behaviour; your local/metro PD's record, to incentivise them policing each
12.
by hatboat 6y ago
I have a similar gripe with Eric Weinstein's podcast mentioned in TFA. I've quite enjoyed the episodes I've listened to, however they can be difficult to parse at times - somewhat defeating the oft-mentioned benefit of listen
13.
by hatboat 6y ago
This is a disingenuous take. There's a big difference between a shorter person wanting extra leg room because it's nice to have, and someone being in actual physical pain because they couldn't afford / weren't quick
14.
by hatboat 7y ago
If you're interested in the topic of this comment and its replies, consider reading about the Vulnerable World Hypothesis [1]. I don't know how much credence to give it, however it's a fascinating thought experiment, especial
15.
by hatboat 7y ago
Because the article's title specifically states that every CS major should know those topics. Should every CS major know formal methods, AI, robotics... ? Yes the heavy math you took was very helpful (and I personally agree as som
16.
by hatboat 7y ago
I think the argument is that "they" is often used in the plural form, and requires context to determine where it's referring to the singular. This context isn't always clear which leads to ambiguity.
17.
by hatboat 7y ago
You obviously can't jail a corporation as you would a person in this situation. However, a person would absolutely be subject to asset forfeiture and proceeds of crime law in such a situation - do the same here. A paltry fine such as t
18.
by hatboat 7y ago
Even then, it's not even a cost of 0.1% EBITDA. It's a cost of 0.1% * p, where p is the probability of actually being caught. How many companies behave unethically because they know full well the will likely get away with it.
19.
by hatboat 7y ago
It was definitely a tedious process, made all the more frustrating when all you wanted to do was play. But damn if your post didn't just make me smile from a wave of nostalgia.
20.
by hatboat 7y ago
Your last paragraph makes little sense. You can advocate for a world where software shouldn't be patented, while still respecting existing IP laws. Thinking everyone should play by the same rules, even if you disagree with those rules,
21.
by hatboat 7y ago
Seconded. If you have any interest in CS and are looking for a cheap mobile game to pass the time, give this a look.
22.
by hatboat 7y ago
As an Australian, your story rings particularly true - simply replace Vimy Ridge with Gallipoli. We even celebrate our (arguably) most important national holiday on the day of the first landing. It took listening to Dan Carlin's podcas
23.
by hatboat 7y ago
I think it's unlikely the parent was referring to actual physical harassment. I agree with the premise that acceptance would probably be higher for someone who comes across as awkward, or makes a social faux pas in an effort to fit in
24.
by hatboat 8y ago
It looks like you're trying to fire a rifle. Would you like help?
25.
by hatboat 8y ago
I agree with the sentiment that review bombing should not be a way to voice criticism, but the unfortunate reality is that it is used extensively. The line from the article which questions how Jiminy Peak managed to get a favourable Google
26.
by hatboat 8y ago
And under your system, what incentive is there for long term capital investment?
27.
by hatboat 8y ago
Why is it I generally only ever hear this argument (or some variant of it, e.g. starving children) when discussing a proposed scientific endeavour? Why not trim the US military budget by 10% and generate 3x as much revenue, you could house