Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hallqv
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
hallqv
2y ago
They promised us super intelligence - all we got was valid json
2.
▲
by
hallqv
2y ago
How does it differ from Poetry
3.
▲
by
hallqv
2y ago
E.g. msnbc, New York Times, cnn
4.
▲
by
hallqv
2y ago
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.00841.pdf
5.
▲
by
hallqv
2y ago
This discussion is so dumb - finetuning a base model costs ~$1 with LORA/QLORA and can yield same performance as gpt-4, but at 1/100 of the cost per token. What Bloomberg did for $10M was not finetuning..
6.
▲
by
hallqv
2y ago
lol Emad was always seemed like an obvious fraud to me. Not quite SBF level but same vibe. Whenever someone goes overboard on the nerd look it’s always a red flag.
7.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
The incumbent US car brands barely does any manufacturing themselves anymore, they are mainly big procurement + assemly + marketing blobs. Not very conducive to driving product innovation.
8.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Afraid of what..? What’s the risk?
9.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Whoever is dumb enough to invest in a company that hasn’t even bothered to come up with their own company name, but just copied the name of the current most hyped competitor in their category, deserves to lose their money.
10.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Depends on your definition of winning - special-purpose tuning is vastly more cost effective since it allows you to train a smaller model that can perform specific tasks as good as a bigger one. A good analogy is building a webapp - would y
11.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Gary Marcus is not a serious person
12.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
If I had a penny each time a human has confidently concluded something that is entirely incorrect… I’ve inadvertently done it countless times myself, and so has every person I know of.
13.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
What you are talking about I would call guessing :) Fact of the matter is that sota LLMs are highly accurate predictors for many topics, certainly above any living human in terms of total AUC of correct predictions on fact based questions.
14.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
You must have a very peculiar definition of a hallucination. Why would an LLM reciting a fact correctly be hallucinating?
15.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Cancer loves sugar.
16.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Seems fair
17.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
What do you mean? China is the major communist economy in the world and they have plenty of “markets“, but the CPC are the ones who pick the winners through legislation and/or subsidies.
18.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
As I stated above what I disagree is a system where legislation is used for other purposes than 1) protecting citizens from harm 2) combating anti-competitive practices by incumbent businesses. The legislation in question clearly falls outs
19.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Of course it’s not beneficial per se to auto makers but it’s relatively more troublesome for smaller automakers than bigger ones. Unless they are focused solely on providing cars that are easy to repair of course. In that case they will be
20.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
This is the worst type of regulatory overreach - a true innovation killer - putting useless regulatory burden on all car manufacturers. It will only benefit the large incumbents that can afford to be inefficient. In what world (except for a
21.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
GM can’t do tech, what else is new?
22.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Yeah HN is full of mids unfortunately..
23.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
It’s actually four times; zip2, PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX
24.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Incredible to double revenue YoY on that level. Elon and Spacex team are truly extraordinary.
25.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Public opinion definitely veers towards over-pessimism, see for example Hans Rosling book Factfullness. Here is a short summary from a psychological perspective: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/sex-murder
26.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
I agree, rational optimism is the way
27.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Haha didn’t catch that. Spot on
28.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
I agree.
29.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Why would we be in a sigmoid? What makes you think that?
30.
▲
by
hallqv
3y ago
Moderating optimism is overrated. Most people should make an effort to be more optimistic, due to our biological negativity bias. That will serve them better.
More ›