halJordan

6 ms·

1.
by halJordan 5d ago
And you think heretic is not abliteraterating models?
2.
by halJordan 7d ago
What rogue agency? What agency hasn't immediately and stridefully buckled to the political pressure of the lawful appointees from this admin?
3.
by halJordan 7d ago
People sued apple for selling a device with no mention of ram and then apple released the next gen saying "this has more ram, you need to upgrade to it to use the features we advertised for last gen." How about avoiding that scena
4.
by halJordan 7d ago
And here we are back to the crux. Sure would be nice if the released material was verifiable instead of "trust me shitstick"
5.
by halJordan 8d ago
Have you checked their api page recently? They're big model is .... glm 5.3 (or one or whatever dot releases)
6.
by halJordan 27d ago
It's a tired reasoning that we have to read every time this comes up. China has been publicly doing what you say they won't if we only just let them buy asml. They've been doing it in 5 year Plans (tm) for decades now. You gu
7.
by halJordan 28d ago
Ah. This is a bold faced lie. There were plenty of options in 2016. Nist released final candidates in 2024 and published the candidates this year. ssh (as noted in tfa) has had pq defaults since 2022.
8.
by halJordan 28d ago
Yes, of course. But no one really wants to be the guy actually renting an entire B300.
9.
by halJordan 28d ago
While I'm highly sympathetic to competing priorities crowding out movement to pq cryptography. At the same time it's not sudden at all. It's been 10 years since nist first said "move shit over"?
10.
by halJordan 1mo ago
Well you see, there's this thing called an embedding and it sits inside a vector space and when attention is applied it disambiguates
11.
by halJordan 1mo ago
Well, ackshually. E do know exactly how big glm 5.2 is. And there's more than enough data to draw conclusions about luna. Or are you one of the guys who says "big bang is just a theory"?
12.
by halJordan 1mo ago
Yes, but there's a difference between finding out whether P=NP and some of the brightest geniuses in the country actively opposing you.
13.
by halJordan 1mo ago
Humans already do struggle with this constraint. Good examples are JRR Martin, Tolkien, and Rothfuss. You cant describe the struggle of picking the next word and then act like humans don't sit at the table struggling to pick the next w
14.
by halJordan 1mo ago
It rarely works (Mitchell and Douhet were famously proven wrong a few short years after WW1). But it is the named reason Kiev gives.
15.
by halJordan 1mo ago
You're asking how someone missed llms. On this website? That demonized them for years and is only now fighting the cultural battle to accept them as useful?
16.
by halJordan 1mo ago
I think there's more to an orange than just fiber. And it's disingenuous to say there isn't, and hurts your credibility to say it. And you absolutely are saying that, no dithering or hem-hawing needed
17.
by halJordan 1mo ago
I disagree. I think if you've come from the time before WiFi, with enough time before it to remember and have nostalgia for it, then you've already made your nut and are simply spending the time you have left in the relative carel
18.
by halJordan 1mo ago
A lot of this concern is ersatz and virtue signaling. Do you really think an llm cant code a fork/exec? Or that it can't setup a named pipe? And what would be the other concerns? That you have a possibly malicious piece of softwar
19.
by halJordan 1mo ago
It could be but proposing a standard and getting it adopted by everyone else is its own monopolistic behavior. Everyone here shits the bed when google tries to do it for ad measurement and decloaking
20.
by halJordan 1mo ago
Disagree with you. Sure forcing sides is bad business, granted. It's not really even worth saying imo. But it's like the prisoner's dilemma. Once the other side makes their suboptimal choice, you're now-optimal choice is
21.
by halJordan 1mo ago
How is this meta commentary when this or its negative version is present on literally every post.
22.
by halJordan 1mo ago
Look at any good breakdown of the us budget. It's healthcare all the way down. The programs axed by doge are terribly small (hence why there was no real savings to be had anyway). The military gets far less of the budget than anyone li
23.
by halJordan 1mo ago
I think you, and apparently many others, are hiding behind mathematical strictures to avoid the discussion. Your argument is actually "what requires an objective truth" Or else you could admit there's no real difference betwe
24.
by halJordan 1mo ago
No, llm providers will start providing a service that looks a lot like rumination or (day)dreaming. Like thats the prompt "you're daydreaming about this work you recently did" then add in whatever is in the current session.
25.
by halJordan 1mo ago
I think the expectation is far different than reality. This isn't about google's TAG hacking back FIN7. This is about LockMart extending their contract from vulnerability research, to throwing these vulnerabilities. They've w
26.
by halJordan 1mo ago
Yes the cfa very clearly spells out what is illegal, and these activities fall into it. It's possible to break the cfa even as government body executing under title 10 or title 50 authority.
27.
by halJordan 1mo ago
Any other non profit maintaining an open source project gets passes bc "volunteers don't owe you anything" and "submit your own patch" catechisms.
28.
by halJordan 1mo ago
Well, they didn't do that. Secondly, drinking alcohol makes you prone to beating your wife. Taking ssri's makes you prone to killing yourself. At no point does anyone seriously comment "wtf do we even have alcohol|anti-depres
29.
by halJordan 1mo ago
He's talking about suing smith & wesson instead of walmart for building a gun that shoots someone, rather than selling the gun
30.
by halJordan 1mo ago
It's the size of a big vm. There's nothing wrong with reserving that much working space for one item.

More ›