gundy

6 ms·

1.
by gundy 13y ago
This shows investment banks are scum: http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/03/11/where-banks...
2.
by gundy 13y ago
So Kevin Rose is not a sixty-millionare. I am disappoint.
3.
by gundy 13y ago
poor is not the same thing as cheap
4.
by gundy 13y ago
Money is simply a manipulation of language backed up by force. The paper coerces sharing (whether fairly or unfairly) of resources (whether labor or physical resources like trees and oil) in a way that does not spontaneously happen without
5.
by gundy 13y ago
Anyone with money would suffice (and pretty much anyone would be willing to provide the service for a song considering there is no risk to them even if they mess up, FB anyone) when floating a stock. Instead banks get to do their retarded s
6.
by gundy 13y ago
BitBucket killed any inclination in me to pay github a penny. And I will stick with them when my team grows because everything is there anyway and the pricing is better. Github tools are really not there to justify the huge sticker price.
7.
by gundy 13y ago
Investment banks are scum. They do basically nothing themselves and eat millions in profit. Simply because of their position and nothing else.
8.
by gundy 13y ago
It's marketing, friend, nothing personal. Just trying to make some money. You know. It's the 'murican way! No principles, just winning and money.
9.
by gundy 13y ago
If the US wants "freedom" on the internet and no internet nationalism (which just means that non-citizens get rights too), it should grant online citizenship to all people of the world. They can all be members of the empire and ac
10.
by gundy 13y ago
Gasland economy here we come!
11.
by gundy 13y ago
In other news psychiatry is bullshit and I would say psychology is not far behind. The whole point of society is that we don't assume people are a certain way until they harm someone. If we no longer do that we're no different fro
12.
by gundy 13y ago
That's all that they are good for adding security that would otherwise not exist. Outside of that under a PaaS, I don't see what they add.
13.
by gundy 13y ago
They are not really efficient. All they do is add an extra layer of security so you can encapsulate that specific process in a chroot with its own networking stack. Other than that the CPU is still fairshared and the memory still has the sa
14.
by gundy 13y ago
In other news OPs startup not the future of PaaS but OpenShift, Redhat's open source alternative is.