Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gibsonf1
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
A Man Who Calls BS on AI: They're Lying About AI, 2027 Is When It All Breaks [video]
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
gibsonf1
20d ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
by
gibsonf1
3mo ago
This discovery fully validates the organic system side of Peter Putnam's theory on induction, the Neuro Conditioned Reflex Principle, that requires changing state at synapses over time to select the nested Relative Dominance feedback w
3.
▲
Data Modeling of Matter Through Space-Time with a Linked Data Hypergraph(LDH) [pdf]
(frederick.graphmetrix.net)
1 points
by
gibsonf1
4mo ago
|
1 comments
4.
▲
by
gibsonf1
4mo ago
The Graphmetrix patent on Conceptual Awareness interfacing with a Linked Data Hypergraph finally came through. This new SystemTwin™ information structure allows us to capture the full space-time data and interlinked documents about a part o
5.
▲
by
gibsonf1
5mo ago
The newish SBCL parallel gc is fantastic and uses no additional memory during gc
6.
▲
by
gibsonf1
6mo ago
Its interesting that they don't even mention the key to human intelligence, concepts, in this list.
7.
▲
by
gibsonf1
6mo ago
Would it work with the parallel GC feature?
8.
▲
by
gibsonf1
6mo ago
Incredible! Is this ready for at scale production use?
9.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
Systems Twin Intelligence, where a Pod represents the full space-time information for part of the world, using Solid Protocol: https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod-server The W3C Linked Web Storage (LWS) working group is transfo
10.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
A key error is there literally are no where close to billions of concepts. Its a misunderstanding of what a concept is as used by us humans. There are an unlimited number of instances and entities, but the concepts we use to think about t
11.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
The 18,000 people who lost their jobs may disagree.
12.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
Our[1] solution to that is to use a hierarchical semantic systems approach such that you can give access to a subsystem or entire biological systems. [1] https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod-server
13.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
Actually, here is an example enterprise internet scale solid solid server: https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod-server
14.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
Thats a terrible ontology (the relations) - needs to be much lower level to understand anything important.
15.
▲
A Tip to Companies: Beware of Promoting AI in Products
(wsj.com)
1 points
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
Seems a bit scary that the "source" text from the pdfs could actually be hallucinated.
17.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
Does it hallucinate with the LLM being used?
18.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
Probably without too much difficulty. If you have a sample to confirm, that would be great. frederick @ graphmetrix . com
19.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
We[1] Create "Units of Thought" from PDF's and then work with those for further discovery where a "Unit of Thought" is any paragraph, title, note heading - something that stands on its own semantically. We then cre
20.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
Yep, they completely missed the boat. They tried to use concepts without actually modeling concepts, making a huge mess of contradicting statements which actually didn't model the world. Using a word in a statement does not a concept
21.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
There is no type of math that can model conceptual reasoning. You can use conceptual reasoning, however, to do math.
22.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
Exactly, we disagree and you are not alone in thinking this. You can use reason to do math, but your can't model reason with math.
23.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
My point is no type of math will work to model reason. Math is one of the many tools of reason, it is not the basis for reason. This is a very common error.
24.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
The error with that is that human reasoning is not mathematical. Math is just one of the many tools of reason.
25.
▲
by
gibsonf1
1y ago
Under the hood would reveal that we think in terms of concepts, attributes, space-time experience etc, and that language is just a means of serializing that conceptual understanding. We do not think in language.
26.
▲
Ask HN: Hetzner Ashburn slowed to 100K speeds?
4 points
by
gibsonf1
2y ago
|
0 comments
27.
▲
by
gibsonf1
2y ago
Also helps that the CEO of the company does Common Lisp Dev.
28.
▲
by
gibsonf1
2y ago
We have had a great experience using Common Lisp [1] for our causal space-time systems digital twin [2] [1] http://sbcl.org/ [2] https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod-server
29.
▲
by
gibsonf1
2y ago
It’s also possible that you do not have information on our technology which models conceptual awareness of matter and change through space-time which is different than any previous attempts?
30.
▲
by
gibsonf1
2y ago
Not at all, we are building conceptual reasoning machines, but it is an entirely different technology than GPT/LLM dl/ml etc. [1] [1] https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod-server
More ›