8 ms·
Not at all, we are building conceptual reasoning machines, but it is an entirely different technology than GPT/LLM dl/ml etc. [1] [1] https://graphmetrix.com/t
by gibsonf1 2y ago
Not at all, we are building conceptual reasoning machines, but it is an entirely different technology than GPT/LLM dl/ml etc. [1]
[1] https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod-server https://graphmetrix.com/trinpod-server
- freilanzer 2y agoIf LLMs can't reason, then this cannot either - whatever this is supposed to be. Not a good argument. Also, since you're apparently working on that product: 'It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.'
- tmnvdb 2y agoConceptual reasoning machines rely on concrete, explicit and intelligble concepts and rules. People like this because it 'looks' like reasoning on the inside. However, our brains, like language models, rely on implicit, distributed representations of concepts and rules. So the intelligble representations of conceptual reasoning machines are maybe too strong a requirement for 'reasoning' unless you want to exclude humans too.
- gibsonf1 2y agoIt’s also possible that you do not have information on our technology which models conceptual awareness of matter and change through space-time which is different than any previous attempts?
- freilanzer 2y agoIs it possible that you don't quite understand LLMs?
- aoeusnth1 2y agoThat's called talking your book. Please spell out how a document indexing and retrieval system is more akin to a "conceptual reasoning machine" compared to o3?