gabrielso

6 ms·

1.
by gabrielso 3mo ago
Oh my, inspecting the page gave me a warm, cozy, nostalgic feeling and made me feel grateful for all the meals <table>s just like that put on my family's table throughout the late 90s and early 2000s.
2.
by gabrielso 6mo ago
I thought the statement was about Perl, not the project. (joking, I owe a lot to Perl and have profound respect for it and most of the community, I hope this joke doesn't get out of hand)
3.
by gabrielso 6mo ago
Good news is that the government can offer free treatment.
4.
by gabrielso 7mo ago
Meh, I still hate at least half of those products/companies...
5.
by gabrielso 1y ago
Yeah make it work in the US where you can fly 4 hours in any direction and still land somewhere that speaks the same language, and not in Europe where a 1:30h drive takes you through 3 different countries that don't know how to talk to
6.
by gabrielso 1y ago
In my experience, non-coders with LLMs can go beyond simple scripts and build non-trivial small applications nowadays, but the difference of outcomes between them and a competent coder with LLMs is still staggering.
7.
by gabrielso 1y ago
I'm not having the same positive experience on a >25yo insanely large and codebase built with questionable engineering practices
8.
by gabrielso 1y ago
The article misses the point that LLMs are not removing the bottleneck of writing code for people who know how to write code . It's removing this bottleneck for everyone else.
9.
by gabrielso 3y ago
Start-ups don't get 1-2 chances to get productivity right. They get 1-2 chances to get PRODUCT right. If they don't get productivity right from the get-go, they only get 1 chance instead of the "1-2 chances". That's
10.
by gabrielso 4y ago
I lost 3 minutes of my life on that article and will lose 5 more to let you know you can skip it. It's just a rant from someone that thinks they're too good to be managed, probably that kind of engineer that has 10 conflicts a wee