forcry

5 ms·

1.
by forcry 5y ago
>your holy CDC and WHO high priests who live in the pockets of big pharma. Even you are wrong. Because they are not in the pockets, but they are the big pharma. They are the marketing arms of big pharma that are just a much more convin
2.
by forcry 5y ago
Is there some evidence to show that people are given RNA tests in the same manner irrespective of vaccination status. I have seen some articles that put forword the "issue" of "needlessly" testing vaccinated people...
3.
by forcry 5y ago
Ask the employer to take liability for any adverse effects that you might suffer and see if changes anything. I wonder why insurance companies are not offering any offers when coming to vaccine injuries. It seems that it would be a very pro
4.
by forcry 5y ago
>Simpson’s paradox explains the risks of comparing data without taking all variables into account Unless of course, when you are counting covid-deaths.
5.
by forcry 5y ago
>Before the vaccine program started there were ~4000 deaths per day in the US, now there are ~100. Clearly it is very effective at reducing death. Changing the way you categorise death can do wonders.. > Q Can you talk about your conc
6.
Lies, Damned Lies, and Vaccine Statistics(drrollergator.substack.com)
73 points by forcry 5y ago|58 comments
7.
by forcry 5y ago
>To save itself, WHO will have to forgo the easy path of private funding and appeasing the rich. It will have to return to democracy, to advocacy for the mass populations it was designed to serve I don't think private funding is the
8.
by forcry 5y ago
>It's a shame that the discourse around this drug has been horribly mangled by conspiracy theorists.. Do you think companies that are developing vaccines and other costly treatments for Covid does not have an incentive to discredit
9.
by forcry 5y ago
True. Got confused.
10.
by forcry 5y ago
>the largest excess mortality in our dataset was observed in the United States This is not very surprising given the following practice.. > Q Can you talk about your concerns about deaths being misreported by coronavirus because of
11.
by forcry 5y ago
> The indicated biological mechanism of IVM, competitive binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely non-epitope specific, possibly yielding full efficacy against emerging viral mutant strains.
12.
by forcry 5y ago
> Three mutations in the spike protein, viz. RSYLTPGD246-253N, 260 L452Q, and F490S help Lambda resist antibody neutralisation, while two additional mutations, T76I and L452Q, make it highly infectious, the researchers found. No problem.
13.
by forcry 5y ago
>That said, I can't seem to find any credentials or publications by the author of this piece "Dr RollerGator PhD". That is probably an alias. I think no one is going to commit career suicide by getting themselves labelled
14.
by forcry 5y ago
Citations for the pre-conditions and data from the initial couple of million vaccinations, if you have them, please?
15.
by forcry 5y ago
https://drrollergator.substack.com/p/damned-lies-and-vaccine...
16.
by forcry 5y ago
So I guess the claims in the articles are not "debunked" solidly. Not sure why you claimed it. > (1) you have serious concerns about possible side effects > (2) you have serious concerns about efficiacy > (3) there is no
17.
by forcry 5y ago
> It is clear that general autonomy can remain a valued principle with specific exceptions. Sure. It is the ever increasing number of "specific exceptions" that people should be worried about.
18.
by forcry 5y ago
> This guy and his writing have been debunked pretty solidly, Can you show me conclusive evidence that phase 2 trials for these vaccines have NOT been skipped? I have looked and couldn't find it.
19.
by forcry 5y ago
So I was asking around how mRNA vaccines got approved after being blocked in approval process for so long, and a little earlier came across this https://anthonycolpo.com/the-junk-science-behind-the-moderna...
20.
by forcry 5y ago
Ok found something https://anthonycolpo.com/the-junk-science-behind-the-moderna... It says, among other things.. >Using reasoning that could only make sense to a government bureaucrat or drug company-sponsored researcher
21.
by forcry 5y ago
Ok found something https://anthonycolpo.com/the-junk-science-behind-the-moderna... It says, among other things.. >Using reasoning that could only make sense to a government bureaucrat or drug company-sponsored researcher
22.
by forcry 5y ago
All this, while the essential systems to capture vaccine safety signal appear to be apparently broken and based on "voluntary reporting", and the world does not give a single fuck about it... https://roundingtheearth.su
23.
by forcry 5y ago
Look, if the following is true >only 3 of Moderna's projects had made it past Phase 1 testing, and only one of these was a vaccine Is it too much if one wonder how these vaccines got past of the trials that were blocking it, by addi
24.
by forcry 5y ago
Thanks for the answer, but sadly it is not very convincing >mRNA tech was for a long time believed to be non-essential Please correct me if I am wrong, but this is is hard to believe. The mRNA tech provide obvious advantages in terms of
25.
by forcry 5y ago
Ok, but why is there no answer? These are really simple questions, right? Also, I don't agree that I am spamming, because I only post the question in the relevant threads.
26.
by forcry 5y ago
Do someone have the answer to the following questions? Why did the mRNA technology remain unapproved for a long time since its inception? What exactly was relaxed in the approval process that lead to its EUA? Since the vaccine has been used
27.
by forcry 5y ago
So it appears that we can infer the following.. You can tell some lies to an vaccine skeptic to make them yield to vaccination. And amusingly the reverse appear to be true as well, that you can tell some facts to a pro-vaxxer to convert the
28.
by forcry 5y ago
Do someone have the answer to the following questions? Why did the mRNA technology remain unapproved for a long time since its inception? What exactly was relaxed in the approval process that lead to its EUA? Since the vaccine has been used
29.
by forcry 5y ago
Basically, it is the same reasoning. But it does not have to be force sterilisation. You can say that any one that is not breathing through a mask is exercising their freedom to spread diseases, and so everyone should wear a mask all the ti
30.
by forcry 5y ago
Not sure what to make of your comment.

More ›