falseeq

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by falseeq 3y ago

   It’s very clear when you buy a Tesla that the car does not completely drive itself without human supervision. It’s part of the agreement, and the use of FSD as the marketing name of the feature doesn’t change that. > The conduct of deliv
2. 2.▲
   by falseeq 3y ago

   Yes, good faith and fair dealing has nothing to do with this and shows that while you may know enough to pull out the restatement, you don’t really get the law. Good faith has to do with conduct in the execution of an agreement that undermi
3. 3.▲
   by falseeq 3y ago

   I’m not totally defending Tesla’s mildly misleading advertising here. I’m saying it’s not fraud and not really comparable to the massive fraud committed by Holmes.
4. 4.▲
   by falseeq 3y ago

   Because the more detailed description of the feature clearly explains what it does and doesn’t do. Say you sign a contract, one section is titled “Seller Assumes Liability for Injury” but then the text of that section lists some circumstanc
5. 5.▲
   by falseeq 3y ago

   No that’s not fraud. Fraud requires a lie and justifiable , detrimental reliance on that lie by a victim.
6. 6.▲
   by falseeq 3y ago

   This is a dumb comment. Leading with stretched claims that are then clarified in the fine print is different than outright lying. No one who did a modicum of due diligence bought a Tesla thinking they were getting a completely self-driving