falsandtru

5 ms·

1.
by falsandtru 2y ago
Transmission speed limit of quantum entanglement: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39865641
2.
by falsandtru 2y ago
The latest world record is updated to 378.9 Tbps by the same research group. Probably not yet published in English. https://www.nict.go.jp/press/2024/03/29-1.html
3.
Effective light cone and digital quantum simulation of interacting bosons(nature.com)
1 points by falsandtru 2y ago|0 comments
4.
by falsandtru 2y ago
Is there any other good service for enterprise development?
5.
by falsandtru 3y ago
That's not what I mean. Well, it probably was not translated well.
6.
by falsandtru 3y ago
It means that it is malicious to replace the title with what would have been the subheading because it looks like a clickbait title. Subheadings do not mean that anything can be changed into a title if it is a subheading. The fact is that t
7.
by falsandtru 3y ago
The original title is "Deepfake Defense Tech Ready for Commercialization, Transition" but has been changed to "DARPA to launch efforts that will bolster defenses against manipulated media". The changed title is unnecessa
8.
by falsandtru 3y ago
> Sometimes I think about how much money people would pay to make their computer run 20x faster. Bottlenecks that can make a computer 20x faster are very rare. First, pay $1m for a specialist to find the bottlenecks. However, it is even
9.
by falsandtru 3y ago
The required explanation is unnecessarily unreadable, so I explain it again. As I wrote in my other comment, I meant the article as it relates to technology. My original comment is hidden below so I explain it again here. The safety of the
10.
by falsandtru 3y ago
It wasn't. The downvote told me that here is the place to be careful about saying thank you. Well, those who downvote against thank you will downvote anything.
11.
by falsandtru 3y ago
I don't want to argue about what to call it. I just confirmed the fact that the text that was deleted and made unreadable is back to readable. Still, I'm surprised that comments are sometimes hidden from even being present here.
12.
by falsandtru 3y ago
So what is the avoided moderation and the failures of the upvoting system? Your rebuttal has too many irrelevant new arguments. All I am saying here is that if some statements can't be read, others can't read the argument. An argu
13.
by falsandtru 3y ago
I don't know why you start making such belated arguments but the upvotes for that comment indicate that it was much more helpful to the viewer than flagging it to make it unreadable. And it does not avoid any moderation. What moderatio
14.
by falsandtru 3y ago
I don't know why you expect people will find your old comment.
15.
by falsandtru 3y ago
No, the presence of the function is not evidence that something is due to that function or the absence of other functions. Many people blindly believe only the speculations that support them and it is unfortunate that much easy confirmation
16.
by falsandtru 3y ago
Knowledge alone is enough to say thank you. There would be no need to be so careful in saying a simple thank you.
17.
by falsandtru 3y ago
> Comments moved thither. Thanks! You are welcome. It would have been better if you would have respected the order of the comments.
18.
by falsandtru 3y ago
> Once I unkilled it, it went back from [flagged][dead] to just [flagged], and it went back to being visible to everyone whether they are logged in or not, or have 'showdead' turned on or not. In other words, you resurrected th
19.
by falsandtru 3y ago
When I logged out, last time it was replaced by flagged on Chrome and I couldn't read the text, but now I can, even though it's still flagged. Now there is a strange thing. Why are the other flagged comments still replaced with fl
20.
by falsandtru 3y ago
> Nothing was deleted. We never delete a comment, except when the author asks us to. I have confirmed that the text of the comment has been replaced by [flagged] and is no longer readable. It's just sophistry to say that the text wa
21.
by falsandtru 3y ago
The previous comment was deleted as expected. You will surely say that you have nothing to do with it. > This comment was, even though it has 8 points, moved from the top of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39674829
22.
by falsandtru 3y ago
Users have now expressed interest totaling over 350 points in several hours.
23.
by falsandtru 3y ago
Hm, this thread once again slid down the top page at an alarming rate, even though the safety of the environment surrounding engineers is a serious concern of engineers. Hacker News is surprisingly dismissive of user interests and votes. No
24.
by falsandtru 3y ago
BBC: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39673589
25.
by falsandtru 3y ago
Is the political safety of the United States on the same level as that of Russia?
26.
by falsandtru 3y ago
Hacker News is extremely strongly manipulated. What users see as popularity order is actually the order manipulated to the moderators' liking. https://github.com/minimaxir/hacker-news-undocumented#behavi... I beli
27.
by falsandtru 3y ago
Reading the cited Cloudflare blog, it seems that the main purpose of this technology is public randomness, and timelock is one of its applications. Since timelock is not the essence of this technology, it is not surprising that the usefulne
28.
by falsandtru 3y ago
Doesn't the fact that resources send different data mean that SRI(Subresource Integrity) checks cannot be performed? As for fingerprinting, it would not be a problem since it is the same as with Etag. https://developer.mozil
29.
by falsandtru 3y ago
FDB, a distributed DB, would be superior if complete order is not required. https://apple.github.io/foundationdb/queues.html
30.
by falsandtru 3y ago
4564711dd08a40cbb845a196bf335bd3ce37a666

More ›