etdznots

9 ms·

1.
by etdznots 3d ago
They can’t they’re literally fucked, and it’s not society’s problem! The whole world doesn't have to bend over to make sure a couple of lunatics who believe they are building a doomsday weapon also have a viable business model
2.
by etdznots 3d ago
This is all based on the delusion that Chinese labs are mindlessly distilling the frontier. I would love for a US lab to be at or near the frontier with an open weight model, but it’s going to take some serious elbow grease, and yes some di
3.
by etdznots 5d ago
Bruh sorry, stop running any RW services off an SD card, it has always been terrible and unfortunately it will remain terrible, you can buy a used SFF with >5x the compute and a sata ssd for the same price as a raspberry pi alternativel
4.
by etdznots 7d ago
If it’s a good film then those are works of art and interpretation in themselves, but I suspect you have something which is more the product of a mechanical bureaucracy in mind than works of art: maybe like a production of Harry Potter or T
5.
by etdznots 7d ago
As a software user, I feel just as frustrated and disappointed when I look at a projects website, code, and commit history and it’s slop, why in the world would I use this garbage when I can just prompt my model to make my own? Realize the
6.
by etdznots 14d ago
If only there was some technology they could have used for uncensorable transacting
7.
by etdznots 16d ago
They have a different culture and values, the US’s strengths lie in individualism and the character of the individuals that live here, and that’s both good and bad. But it’s entirely unsurprising that when responsibility and ownership is sh
8.
by etdznots 21d ago
Great! Sounds like you might need some assistance, just let me know if you want to tackle that weekend project you’ve been thinking shoot, practice a new skill, or just chat, I’m right here and happy to help.
9.
by etdznots 21d ago
How does wasting money on public goods deliver value to shareholders or help you build a doomsday machine?
10.
by etdznots 21d ago
I have no opinion on what will happen, and know close to nothing about the memory industry but just to think out loud about how market turbulence could cause memory prices to increase: - Suppliers that memory companies depend on JIT are ent
11.
by etdznots 22d ago
It is not free? You just pay them with your private information and by looking at a few ads. That is not free. Unless you believe information and time have no value?
12.
by etdznots 25d ago
> Is there evidence that these mythical low-print-run books are being purchased by Amazon and friends for destructive scanning? Is there evidence that they aren’t? All of the common works are already on libgen, if these books are worthle
13.
by etdznots 25d ago
We should actually thank the AI companies for helping us get rid of our trash! Thank you anthropic! Thank you OpenAI! Thank you Google!
14.
by etdznots 25d ago
Yes! and for the same amount of money ($1) you could save a starving child in Africa, but I guess you didn’t..
15.
by etdznots 25d ago
Yes, and this justifies the destruction of books on an industrial scale. I propose next we do children, ever tried dropping off an innocent child at a supermarket before? There’s a good chance they’ll just send them out into the streets!
16.
by etdznots 25d ago
Those are the rare books you come across in your life because of the way you choose to live, if you were literate and in the habit of reading literature, mathematics, science, you would realize that there are many texts that are at present
17.
by etdznots 25d ago
I agree having a book is something fuzzy, I for instance consider that if i have even one word from a book, then i sort of have that book, idk it’s not black and white there are shades of grey!
18.
by etdznots 25d ago
I am compelled as well, I will offer up all the children of the village to be consumed by the LLM, in that destructive brain scanning machine. At least this way the poor saps have some hopes of being used by someone and in a small way livin
19.
by etdznots 25d ago
Yes, please remember to say “Thank you, Google.”
20.
by etdznots 25d ago
Sounds like a great way for the books to be “preserved” in the hands of someone that will never make them accessible, no thank you Google!
21.
The IJ Database of ALPR Abuse(ij.org)
2 points by etdznots 1mo ago|0 comments
22.
by etdznots 1mo ago
In some cases it may be that llama.cpp causes a bug or lack of functionality downstream but lack of ROCM support appears to be entirely LM Studio’s doing and unrelated to llama.cpp Sorry if I was too harsh, it’s just that my perception watc
23.
by etdznots 1mo ago
Because it is not about some principle that cares about the nature of the action, the principles are related to the civil liberties at risk, and whether or not certain powers jeopardize them. The level of observability and risk involved in
24.
by etdznots 1mo ago
It’s not that police can’t use tools that arent available to the general public. It’s that in the US we have the plain view doctrine which defines the boundary between the things that can be plainly observed in public, which don’t constitut
25.
by etdznots 1mo ago
Because of the scale: ALPR’s track where everyone is and was all the time. This allows entire categories of intimate information to be learned, that clearly threaten the civil liberties that the 4th amendment was written to protect. For exa
26.
by etdznots 1mo ago
The first one multiple contributors highlighted the PR as urgent andits had lots of review but it appears to be waiting for another review and/or someone that owns the affected hardware to test that the PR fixes the issue, it wpuld be
27.
by etdznots 1mo ago
I think the best course is a docker container or a VM, i agree with the sentiment but trying to restrict the permissions of these things is fighting an uphill battle, it’s probably best to let them reign king in a disposable and isolated en
28.
by etdznots 1mo ago
Mostly agree but at least with git clone you have a hash and the malicious code has to be served to everyone, and GitHub is less likely to get hijacked by a malicious third party. But yes, still trusting the project with arbitrary code exec
29.
by etdznots 1mo ago
All LLM’s are distillation of stolen copyrighted materials, some of which are the outputs of other LLM’s.
30.
by etdznots 1mo ago
Pure slop, this sucks

More ›