In some cases it may be that llama.cpp causes a bug or lack of functionality downstream but lack of ROCM support appears to be entirely LM Studio’s doing and un

In some cases it may be that llama.cpp causes a bug or lack of functionality downstream but lack of ROCM support appears to be entirely LM Studio’s doing and unrelated to llama.cpp Sorry if I was too harsh, it’s just that my perception watching the repo has been that the llama.cpp devs are by far the most cautious and slow moving of all the inference implementations, so I found your perspective a bit surprising, I do think that the desire for stable software that never break, and software that supports the latest models and devices/device API’s are conflicting, nothing will do both, and I think that llama.cpp devs do a good job of balancing between shipping features and not breaking users.